OBJECTIVE: A standardized tampon insertion and removal test, the Tampon Test provides an alternative to sexual intercourse pain as an outcome measure for vulvodynia research. We report upon the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Tampon Test as an outcome measure for vulvodynia clinical trials. METHODS: Outcome measures were assessed in women enrolled in the Vulvar Vestibulitis Clinical Trial, a randomized clinical trial of oral desipramine and topical lidocaine effectiveness. Reliability estimates of the Tampon Test using the Kappa statistic evaluated week-to-week measures at baseline. Tampon Test construct and discriminant validity were assessed through correlation with other outcome measures. Patients' ability to regularly perform the Tampon Test was compared with regularity of reporting intercourse pain. RESULTS: During the 2-week baseline phase, women with vulvodynia reported stable mean Tampon Test scores 4.6+/-2.6 (week -2); 4.6+/-2.7 (week -1); and 4.7+/-2.8 (week 0) with moderate week-to-week reliability (weighted Kappa 0.52). Over an 8-week phase of trial intervention, change in the Tampon Test measure significantly correlated to a number of outcome measures, including daily pain (r=0.42), intercourse pain (r=0.35), cotton swab vestibular pain (r=0.38), and the Brief Pain Inventory (r=0.49). Women with vulvodynia study participants performed the Tampon Test 96.3% of the requested time, which was twofold higher adherence than intercourse pain measurement (49.7%). CONCLUSION: The Tampon Test reflects a real life experience that is reliable, with good construct validity as shown by the breadth of correlated outcome measures. The Tampon Test is an appropriate outcome measure for vulvodynia research that can be considered for use as the primary efficacy endpoint in clinical trials of treatments for vulvodynia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00276068 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: A standardized tampon insertion and removal test, the Tampon Test provides an alternative to sexual intercourse pain as an outcome measure for vulvodynia research. We report upon the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Tampon Test as an outcome measure for vulvodynia clinical trials. METHODS: Outcome measures were assessed in women enrolled in the Vulvar Vestibulitis Clinical Trial, a randomized clinical trial of oral desipramine and topical lidocaine effectiveness. Reliability estimates of the Tampon Test using the Kappa statistic evaluated week-to-week measures at baseline. Tampon Test construct and discriminant validity were assessed through correlation with other outcome measures. Patients' ability to regularly perform the Tampon Test was compared with regularity of reporting intercourse pain. RESULTS: During the 2-week baseline phase, women with vulvodynia reported stable mean Tampon Test scores 4.6+/-2.6 (week -2); 4.6+/-2.7 (week -1); and 4.7+/-2.8 (week 0) with moderate week-to-week reliability (weighted Kappa 0.52). Over an 8-week phase of trial intervention, change in the Tampon Test measure significantly correlated to a number of outcome measures, including daily pain (r=0.42), intercourse pain (r=0.35), cotton swab vestibular pain (r=0.38), and the Brief Pain Inventory (r=0.49). Women with vulvodynia study participants performed the Tampon Test 96.3% of the requested time, which was twofold higher adherence than intercourse pain measurement (49.7%). CONCLUSION: The Tampon Test reflects a real life experience that is reliable, with good construct validity as shown by the breadth of correlated outcome measures. The Tampon Test is an appropriate outcome measure for vulvodynia research that can be considered for use as the primary efficacy endpoint in clinical trials of treatments for vulvodynia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00276068 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Sophie Bergeron; Yitzchak M Binik; Samir Khalifé; Kelly Pagidas; Howard I Glazer; Marta Meana; Rhonda Amsel Journal: Pain Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Nathaniel P Katz; Robert D Kerns; Gerold Stucki; Robert R Allen; Nicholas Bellamy; Daniel B Carr; Julie Chandler; Penney Cowan; Raymond Dionne; Bradley S Galer; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Cynthia G McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Wendye Robbins; James P Robinson; Margaret Rothman; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Wendy Stein; Jane Tollett; Joachim Wernicke; James Witter Journal: Pain Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Laurie B Burke; Richard Gershon; Margaret Rothman; Jane Scott; Robert R Allen; Hampton J Atkinson; Julie Chandler; Charles Cleeland; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; David Kellstein; Robert D Kerns; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Mitchell B Max; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Dwight E Moulin; Turo Nurmikko; Steve Quessy; Srinivasa Raja; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; James P Robinson; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Gerold Stucki; Jane Tollett; Thorsten von Stein; Mark S Wallace; Joachim Wernicke; Richard E White; Amanda C Williams; James Witter; Kathleen W Wyrwich Journal: Pain Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Candi C Bachour; Gloria A Bachmann; David C Foster; Jim Y Wan; Leslie A Rawlinson; Candace S Brown Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: David C Foster; Merrill Beth Kotok; Li-Shan Huang; Arthur Watts; David Oakes; Fred M Howard; Ellen L Poleshuck; Chris J Stodgell; Robert H Dworkin Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Arpana Gupta; Davis C Woodworth; Benjamin M Ellingson; Andrea J Rapkin; Bruce Naliboff; Lisa A Kilpatrick; Jean Stains; Salome Masghati; Kirsten Tillisch; Emeran A Mayer; Jennifer S Labus Journal: J Pain Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Candace S Brown; David C Foster; Jim Y Wan; Leslie A Rawlinson; Gloria A Bachmann Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-06-29 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jennifer S Gewandter; Jenna Chaudari; Katarzyna B Iwan; Rachel Kitt; Sawsan As-Sanie; Gloria Bachmann; Quentin Clemens; H Henry Lai; Frank Tu; G Nicholas Verne; Katy Vincent; Ursula Wesselmann; QiQi Zhou; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Shannon M Smith Journal: J Pain Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 5.820