Literature DB >> 26325083

Presenting symptoms among premenopausal and postmenopausal women with vulvodynia: a case series.

Nancy A Phillips1, Candace Brown, David Foster, Candi Bachour, Leslie Rawlinson, Jim Wan, Gloria Bachmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether there are differences in the clinical presentation of symptoms and vulvar pain ratings in postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) enrolled in a clinical trial, after correcting for estrogen deficiency.
METHODS: Questionnaire data were collected from 76 premenopausal and 24 postmenopausal women enrolled in a clinical trial for PVD. The questionnaire obtained information about the presence or absence of vulvar pain, the characteristics of this pain, and information about the women's demographic characteristics and reproductive health history. Participants were clinically confirmed to have PVD by a positive cotton swab test on pelvic examination and either absence of or corrected vulvovaginal atrophy based on Ratkoff staining with less than 10% parabasal cells. Women completed a standardized questionnaire describing their vulvar symptoms and rated daily pain on a visual analog scale (0 = no pain to 10 = worse pain imaginable) from sexual intercourse, tampon insertion (as a surrogate measure of intercourse) and 24-hour vulvar pain for 2 weeks during the screening period. Pretreatment data were analyzed before pharmacologic intervention. Chi-square was used to determine differences between pre- and postmenopausal women in demographic characteristics and clinical presentation, and independent t tests were used to analyze pain ratings by (0-10) numeric rating scale (NRS).
RESULTS: The average ages of premenopausal and postmenopausal women were (30.6 ± 8.6 y) and (54.4 ± 6.5 y), respectively. The groups significantly differed with regard to relationship status (P = 0.002) and race (P = 0.03), but did not differ in years of education (P = 0.49), income level (P = 0.29), or duration of symptoms (P = 0.09). Postmenopausal women reported significantly more vulvar burning (70.00% vs 43.42%, P = 0.03), but there were no differences in vulvar itching (20.00% vs 22.37%, P = 0.82), vulvar stinging (40.00% vs 36.84%, P = 0.79), vulvar aching (50.00% vs 63.16%, P = 0.28), and vulvar stabbing (60.00% vs 71.06% P = 0.34) or in mean number of symptoms (2.40 ± 1.0 vs 2.37 ± 1.4, P = 0.92). Of the 70 participants completing diaries and meeting tampon insertion pain, there were no significant differences in mean (±SD) NRS pain ratings of postmenopausal compared with premenopausal women for tampon insertion (5.66 ± 1.93 vs 5.83 ± 2.15, P = 0.77), daily vulvar pain (3.20 ± 2.55 vs 3.83 ± 2.49, P = 0.38) and sexual intercourse (6.00 ± 2.53 vs 5.98 ± 2.29, P = 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and postmenopausal women with PVD have similar pain scores, and with the exception of a higher incidence of burning in postmenopausal women, similar presenting clinical symptoms. The statistical power of this conclusion is limited by the small number of postmenopausal women in the study. Further research on the vulvar pain experience of the older woman with PVD is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26325083      PMCID: PMC4666723          DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of the vaginal maturation index.

Authors:  B McEndree
Journal:  Nurse Pract       Date:  1999-09

2.  Report of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease terminology and classification of vulvodynia.

Authors:  Hope K Haefner
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Vulvar vestibulitis: prevalence and historic features in a general gynecologic practice population.

Authors:  M F Goetsch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Reliability and validity of self-reported symptoms for predicting vulvodynia.

Authors:  Barbara D Reed; Hope K Haefner; Siobán D Harlow; Daniel W Gorenflo; Ananda Sen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Biopsychosocial profile of women with dyspareunia.

Authors:  M Meana; Y M Binik; S Khalife; D R Cohen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Clinical profile of vulvodynia patients. A prospective study of 300 patients.

Authors:  L A Sadownik
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Characteristics of women with vulvar pain disorders: responses to a Web-based survey.

Authors:  Allan S Gordon; Manijeh Panahian-Jand; Fay Mccomb; Chiara Melegari; Sandi Sharp
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2003

8.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

9.  A population-based assessment of chronic unexplained vulvar pain: have we underestimated the prevalence of vulvodynia?

Authors:  Bernard L Harlow; Elizabeth Gunther Stewart
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2003

10.  Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome.

Authors:  E G Friedrich
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chronic vulvar pain in a cohort of post-menopausal women: Atrophy or Vulvodynia?

Authors:  Susanna D Mitro; Siobán D Harlow; John F Randolph; Barbara D Reed
Journal:  Womens Midlife Health       Date:  2016-06-09

2.  Feasibility and acceptability of somatocognitive therapy in the management of women with provoked localized vestibulodynia-ProLoVe feasibility study.

Authors:  Mette Bøymo Kaarbø; Kristine Grimen Danielsen; Gro Killi Haugstad; Anne Lise Ording Helgesen; Slawomir Wojniusz
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-03-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.