OBJECTIVE: Dual-source CT improves temporal resolution, and theoretically improves the diagnostic image quality of coronary artery examinations without requiring preexamination beta-blockade. The purpose of our study was to show the improved diagnostic image quality of dual-source CT compared with single-source CT despite the absence of preexamination beta-blockade in the dual-source CT group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery evaluation with either single-source CT or dual-source CT at our institution between February 2005 and October 2006. Examination reports were analyzed for the presence of image artifacts, and image quality was graded on a 3-point scale (no, mild, or severe artifact). Type of artifact (motion, calcium, quantum mottle) was also noted. RESULTS: Examinations (339 single-source CT and 126 dual-source CT) of 465 patients were analyzed. Artifact was reported in 39.8% of examinations using single-source CT and in 29.4% of examinations using dual-source CT (p < 0.05). The number of examinations with motion artifact was significantly higher with single-source CT than with dual-source CT (15.9% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001) despite significantly higher heart rates in the dual-source CT group (59.4 +/- 8.4 vs 68.6 +/- 14.6 beats per minute; p < 0.001). No patients in the dual-source CT group received preexamination beta-blockade compared with 81% of patients in the single-source CT group. The presence of severe (nondiagnostic) calcium artifact was also significantly reduced in the dual-source CT group (13.0% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dual-source CT provides significantly better diagnostic image quality than single-source CT despite higher heart rates in the dual-source CT group. These findings support the use of dual-source CT for coronary artery imaging without the need for preexamination beta-blockade.
OBJECTIVE: Dual-source CT improves temporal resolution, and theoretically improves the diagnostic image quality of coronary artery examinations without requiring preexamination beta-blockade. The purpose of our study was to show the improved diagnostic image quality of dual-source CT compared with single-source CT despite the absence of preexamination beta-blockade in the dual-source CT group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery evaluation with either single-source CT or dual-source CT at our institution between February 2005 and October 2006. Examination reports were analyzed for the presence of image artifacts, and image quality was graded on a 3-point scale (no, mild, or severe artifact). Type of artifact (motion, calcium, quantum mottle) was also noted. RESULTS: Examinations (339 single-source CT and 126 dual-source CT) of 465 patients were analyzed. Artifact was reported in 39.8% of examinations using single-source CT and in 29.4% of examinations using dual-source CT (p < 0.05). The number of examinations with motion artifact was significantly higher with single-source CT than with dual-source CT (15.9% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001) despite significantly higher heart rates in the dual-source CT group (59.4 +/- 8.4 vs 68.6 +/- 14.6 beats per minute; p < 0.001). No patients in the dual-source CT group received preexamination beta-blockade compared with 81% of patients in the single-source CT group. The presence of severe (nondiagnostic) calcium artifact was also significantly reduced in the dual-source CT group (13.0% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dual-source CT provides significantly better diagnostic image quality than single-source CT despite higher heart rates in the dual-source CT group. These findings support the use of dual-source CT for coronary artery imaging without the need for preexamination beta-blockade.
Authors: Rolf Symons; Justin Z Morris; Colin O Wu; Amir Pourmorteza; Mark A Ahlman; João A C Lima; Marcus Y Chen; Marissa Mallek; Veit Sandfort; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jin Ho Hwang; Sung Min Ko; Hong Gee Roh; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Joon Suk Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 3.500