Nancy L Guo1, Kursad Tosun, Kimberly Horn. 1. Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center/Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-9300, USA. lguo@hsc.wvu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is a well-known risk factor of lung carcinogenesis. The clinical impact of smoking on lung cancer metastases and survival remains unclear. We sought to investigate the effect of smoking intensity on lung cancer treatment failure (represented by overall survival), and the interactions between smoking and clinicopathological factors in lung cancer progression. METHODS: Clinical information was obtained from four non-small cell lung cancer patient cohorts (n=347). Twenty patients were excluded from the analysis because their smoking history was not available. The distribution of smoking intensity on patient age (> or =60 years or <60 years), gender, tumor differentiation (poor, moderate and well differentiated), and clinical stage (1, 2, or 3) was assessed with Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. The effect of smoking on cause-specific lung cancer mortality was estimated by using Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The interactions between clinicopathological factors and smoking intensity with regard to lung cancer overall survival were evaluated with analysis of variance (ANOVA) for Cox modeling. RESULTS: Greater smoking intensity at diagnosis was found in older patients (> or =60 years; p=0.022), male (p=1.35e-7), poorly differentiated tumors (p=8.51e-5), patients with tumor stage 2 (p=0.031), and squamous cell lung cancer patients (p=2.2e-16). Patients who smoked more than 61 packs/year had an increased risk for lung cancer recurrence (hazard ratio=1.41, 95% CI: [1.03, 1.94], log-rank p=0.032) and shorter overall survival period (log-rank p=0.033, Kaplan-Meier analysis) than those who smoked less than 61 packs/year. ANOVA analysis showed that smoking intensity (p=0.03) and tumor stage (p=1.2e-6) are the only significant prognostic factors of lung cancer, whereas patient age, gender, and tumor differentiation were not significant in lung cancer prognostication. There were significant interactions between smoking and clinical stage (p=0.02) as well as patient age and tumor differentiation (p=0.03) in lung cancer progression. CONCLUSION: Smoking intensity at diagnosis is an independent, significant prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer. This factor could be used in patient selection for chemoprevention of tumor metastases and relapse. Additionally, the information may be used for clinically relevant tobacco prevention and intervention messages.
BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is a well-known risk factor of lung carcinogenesis. The clinical impact of smoking on lung cancer metastases and survival remains unclear. We sought to investigate the effect of smoking intensity on lung cancer treatment failure (represented by overall survival), and the interactions between smoking and clinicopathological factors in lung cancer progression. METHODS: Clinical information was obtained from four non-small cell lung cancerpatient cohorts (n=347). Twenty patients were excluded from the analysis because their smoking history was not available. The distribution of smoking intensity on patient age (> or =60 years or <60 years), gender, tumor differentiation (poor, moderate and well differentiated), and clinical stage (1, 2, or 3) was assessed with Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. The effect of smoking on cause-specific lung cancer mortality was estimated by using Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The interactions between clinicopathological factors and smoking intensity with regard to lung cancer overall survival were evaluated with analysis of variance (ANOVA) for Cox modeling. RESULTS: Greater smoking intensity at diagnosis was found in older patients (> or =60 years; p=0.022), male (p=1.35e-7), poorly differentiated tumors (p=8.51e-5), patients with tumor stage 2 (p=0.031), and squamous cell lung cancerpatients (p=2.2e-16). Patients who smoked more than 61 packs/year had an increased risk for lung cancer recurrence (hazard ratio=1.41, 95% CI: [1.03, 1.94], log-rank p=0.032) and shorter overall survival period (log-rank p=0.033, Kaplan-Meier analysis) than those who smoked less than 61 packs/year. ANOVA analysis showed that smoking intensity (p=0.03) and tumor stage (p=1.2e-6) are the only significant prognostic factors of lung cancer, whereas patient age, gender, and tumor differentiation were not significant in lung cancer prognostication. There were significant interactions between smoking and clinical stage (p=0.02) as well as patient age and tumor differentiation (p=0.03) in lung cancer progression. CONCLUSION: Smoking intensity at diagnosis is an independent, significant prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer. This factor could be used in patient selection for chemoprevention of tumor metastases and relapse. Additionally, the information may be used for clinically relevant tobacco prevention and intervention messages.
Authors: Olga Y Gorlova; Christopher Amos; Claudia Henschke; Lei Lei; Margaret Spitz; Qingyi Wei; Xifeng Wu; Marek Kimmel Journal: Hum Hered Date: 2003 Impact factor: 0.444
Authors: Koh Miura; Elise D Bowman; Richard Simon; Amy C Peng; Ana I Robles; Raymond T Jones; Toyomasa Katagiri; Ping He; Hiroki Mizukami; Lu Charboneau; Takefumi Kikuchi; Lance A Liotta; Yusuke Nakamura; Curtis C Harris Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: P D Scanlon; J E Connett; L A Waller; M D Altose; W C Bailey; A S Buist; D P Tashkin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: A Bhattacharjee; W G Richards; J Staunton; C Li; S Monti; P Vasa; C Ladd; J Beheshti; R Bueno; M Gillette; M Loda; G Weber; E J Mark; E S Lander; W Wong; B E Johnson; T R Golub; D J Sugarbaker; M Meyerson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Mark D Thornquist; Mark G Kris; Ramsey C Tate; Matt J Barnett; Lillian J Hsieh; Colin B Begg Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David G Beer; Sharon L R Kardia; Chiang-Ching Huang; Thomas J Giordano; Albert M Levin; David E Misek; Lin Lin; Guoan Chen; Tarek G Gharib; Dafydd G Thomas; Michelle L Lizyness; Rork Kuick; Satoru Hayasaka; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mark D Iannettoni; Mark B Orringer; Samir Hanash Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kerby Shedden; Jeremy M G Taylor; Steven A Enkemann; Ming-Sound Tsao; Timothy J Yeatman; William L Gerald; Steven Eschrich; Igor Jurisica; Thomas J Giordano; David E Misek; Andrew C Chang; Chang Qi Zhu; Daniel Strumpf; Samir Hanash; Frances A Shepherd; Keyue Ding; Lesley Seymour; Katsuhiko Naoki; Nathan Pennell; Barbara Weir; Roel Verhaak; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Todd Golub; Michael Gruidl; Anupama Sharma; Janos Szoke; Maureen Zakowski; Valerie Rusch; Mark Kris; Agnes Viale; Noriko Motoi; William Travis; Barbara Conley; Venkatraman E Seshan; Matthew Meyerson; Rork Kuick; Kevin K Dobbin; Tracy Lively; James W Jacobson; David G Beer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-07-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Daniel M Moreira; Jodi A Antonelli; Joseph C Presti; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Urology Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Melissa Rotunno; Nan Hu; Hua Su; Chaoyu Wang; Alisa M Goldstein; Andrew W Bergen; Dario Consonni; Angela C Pesatori; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Sholom Wacholder; Joanna Shih; Neil E Caporaso; Phil R Taylor; Maria Teresa Landi Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-07-08
Authors: E Bria; M Milella; F Cuppone; S Novello; A Ceribelli; V Vaccaro; I Sperduti; A Gelibter; G V Scagliotti; F Cognetti; D Giannarelli Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mariano Provencio; Enric Carcereny; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Rafael López-Castro; María Guirado; Carlos Camps; Joaquim Bosch-Barrera; Rosario García-Campelo; Ana Laura Ortega-Granados; José Luis González-Larriba; Joaquín Casal-Rubio; Manuel Domine; Bartomeu Massutí; María Ángeles Sala; Reyes Bernabé; Juana Oramas; Elvira Del Barco Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2019-08