Literature DB >> 19299221

A facile technique to make articulating spacers for infected total knee arthroplasty.

Yu-Ping Su1, Oscar K Lee, Wei-Ming Chen, Tain-Hsiung Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To treat total knee arthroplasty, 2-stage revision, including removal and reimplantation, remains the standard treatment for the infected arthroplasty. Articulating cement spacer has been shown to provide better functional results after reimplantation. However, its cost as a manufactured product is not always easily affordable and the choice of antibiotics is not flexible either. The authors have developed a method for surgeons to make cement-on-cement articulating spacers themselves by using an impression-taking technique with polydimethyl siloxane. The current study was conducted to test their clinical efficacy.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with infected total knee arthroplasties were prospectively treated with 2-stage revision using articulating spacers made by this technique. The clinical assessment included intraoperative finding, surgical records, radiographic and laboratory examination and final functional scores. All the patients were regularly followed-up.
RESULTS: Fourteen of the 15 patients (93.3%) had infection eradicated, of which 13 patients received revision arthroplasty successfully. The average interval between the resection arthroplasty and the final procedure was 3.5 months. During this period, most of the patients could sit comfortably with bent knees and walk with partial weight-bearing. No patients had secondary bone loss. The range of motion after revision surgery achieved an average of 110 degrees. The average Hospital for Special Surgery score was 90.5 points, and none had recurrent infection after an average of 47.5 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Treating infected total knee arthroplasty with these self-made articulating spacers eradicates infection effectively, improves the life quality before reimplantation and provides good final results without significant complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19299221     DOI: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70039-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  9 in total

1.  The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Federica Rosso; Antongiulio Marmotti; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  [Dynamic versus static cement spacer in periprosthetic knee infection: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Musa Citak; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Siraj A Sayeed; Qais Naziri; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Two-stage revision surgery for infected total knee replacements: reasonable function and high success rate with the use of primary knee replacement implants as temporary spacers.

Authors:  Ben Arthur Marson; Samuel T Walters; Benjamin V Bloch; Khosrow Sehat
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-05

5.  Comparison of articulating and static spacers regarding infection with resistant organisms in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  En-Rung Chiang; Yu-Ping Su; Tain-Hsiung Chen; Fang-Yao Chiu; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Are Static Spacers Superior to Articulated Spacers in the Staged Treatment of Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michele Fiore; Andrea Sambri; Matteo Filippini; Lorenzo Morante; Claudio Giannini; Azzurra Paolucci; Claudia Rondinella; Renato Zunarelli; Pierluigi Viale; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement.

Authors:  James P M Masters; Nicholas A Smith; Pedro Foguet; Mike Reed; Helen Parsons; Andrew P Sprowson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Loading capacity of dynamic knee spacers: a comparison between hand-moulded and COPAL spacers.

Authors:  Sook-Yee Chong; Lu Shen; Sandra Frantz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Application of 3D Printing-Assisted Articulating Spacer in Two-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Lingtong Kong; Jiawei Mei; Wufei Ge; Xiansheng Jin; Xiaoxuan Chen; Xianzuo Zhang; Chen Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.