Literature DB >> 28780594

Two-stage revision surgery for infected total knee replacements: reasonable function and high success rate with the use of primary knee replacement implants as temporary spacers.

Ben Arthur Marson1, Samuel T Walters2, Benjamin V Bloch3, Khosrow Sehat3.   

Abstract

Two-stage revision surgery for infected total knee replacements remains the gold standard treatment. Articulating spacers are preferred to static spacers for improved functional outcome. Articulating spacers made of cement can be prone to fracture, may not be suitable for full weight bearing, create abrasion debris and necessitate second-stage revision surgery. An alternative is the use of primary knee replacement implants as temporary spacers. With this technique, implants are loosely cemented into place at time of revision, allow the patient reasonable mobility and an ability to fully weight bear and can obviate the need for second-stage surgery. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing revision for infection over two years was conducted. Patients were clinically assigned to single- or two-stage revision. Patients who had a temporary knee replacement, that is, a primary knee replacement used as an articulating spacer, were identified and contacted to complete an Oxford Knee Score. Time to second stage and recurrence was identified from the notes 23 patients received temporary knee replacements. Of these, one patient died, 13 proceeded to a second-stage revision and nine remain in situ. Median time to second-stage revision was 19 weeks [range 11-27]. No patients had re-infection. Median follow-up for ongoing temporary knee replacements was 43 weeks [range 24-90]. Four temporary implants had survived for longer than 1 year. Median Oxford Knee Score was 26 [23-32] and satisfaction score was 8 out of 10 [8-8]. These early results show that knee replacement implants used as spacers provide a good alternative to cement-based articulating spacers with low re-infection rates. Their additional cost when compared with cement spacers is offset by the fact that many patients achieve adequate function and frail patients can avoid a revision procedure. Level of evidence Case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Infection; Revision surgery; Spacers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28780594     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2016-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  25 in total

1.  The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D Campbell; R W McGraw; C P Beauchamp; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-08

2.  Intraoperative molds to create an articulating spacer for the infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Keith R Berend; Gregg R Klein; Alexander C Gordon; Adolph V Lombardi; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Systematic review comparing static and articulating spacers used for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Pivec; Qais Naziri; Kimona Issa; Samik Banerjee; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Gram-negative prosthetic joint infection: outcome of a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention approach. A large multicentre study.

Authors:  D Rodríguez-Pardo; C Pigrau; J Lora-Tamayo; A Soriano; M D del Toro; J Cobo; J Palomino; G Euba; M Riera; M Sánchez-Somolinos; N Benito; M Fernández-Sampedro; L Sorli; L Guio; J A Iribarren; J M Baraia-Etxaburu; A Ramos; A Bahamonde; X Flores-Sánchez; P S Corona; J Ariza
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Management of periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty using a custom made articulating spacer (CUMARS); the Exeter experience.

Authors:  Jason D Tsung; James A L Rohrsheim; Sarah L Whitehouse; Matthew J Wilson; Jonathan R Howell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Treatment of acute periprosthetic infections with prosthesis retention: Review of current concepts.

Authors:  Jesse Wp Kuiper; Robin Tjeenk Willink; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Sascha Colen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

7.  Infection after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A W Blom; J Brown; A H Taylor; G Pattison; S Whitehouse; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

8.  Single-stage revision for the infected total knee replacement: results from a single centre.

Authors:  S Tibrewal; F Malagelada; L Jeyaseelan; F Posch; G Scott
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Hand-made articulating spacers in two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: good outcome in 30 patients.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Javier Pereiro; Homid Fahandez-Saddi; Angel Villamor
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?

Authors:  Fares Sami Haddad; Mohamed Sukeik; Sulaiman Alazzawi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Articulating vs Static Spacers for Native Knee Infection in the Setting of Degenerative Joint Disease.

Authors:  Jessica Hooper; Prerna Arora; Shanthi Kappagoda; James I Huddleston; Stuart B Goodman; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-11

Review 2.  Articular spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip and the knee.

Authors:  Andy Craig; S W King; B H van Duren; V T Veysi; S Jain; J Palan
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  A Mid-term Follow-up Study on the Reimplantation of Autoclaved Femoral and Tibial Components as Spacers for Treating Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peng Li; Zhiqi Zhu; Xiangyang Tang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.