Literature DB >> 19294003

Prevalence, morphologic features and proliferation indices of breast carcinoma molecular classes using immunohistochemical surrogate markers.

Rohit Bhargava1, Joan Striebel, Sushil Beriwal, John C Flickinger, Agnieszka Onisko, Gretchen Ahrendt, David J Dabbs.   

Abstract

There is dearth of studies that provide a practical working formulation of breast cancer gene expression analysis for the surgical pathologist. ER, PR, HER2 were used as surrogate markers to classify 205 breast carcinomas into molecular classes. Ki-67 labeling index was calculated using an image analysis system. The data was analyzed for molecular class prevalence, and inter-relationships amongst morphologic parameters, Ki-67 index, and molecular classes. Of the 205 tumors, 113 (55%) were classified as luminal A (strong ER+, HER2 negative), 34 (17%) as luminal B (weak to moderate ER+, HER2 negative), 32 (15%) as triple negative (negative for ER/PR and HER2), 8 (4%) as ERBB2 (negative for ER/PR but HER2+), 10 (5%) as luminal A-HER2 hybrid (strong ER+ and HER2+), and 8 (4%) as luminal B-HER2 hybrid (weak to moderate ER+ and HER2+). The average Ki-67 index was lowest in luminal A (15.8%), intermediate for ERBB2 (27.8%) and highest for triple negative tumors (>50%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses found the following associations: ERBB2 tumors with apocrine differentiation (p=0.0031); Triple negative tumors with high Ki-67 index (p<0.0001) and CK5 positivity (p<0.0001); HER2 negative-low receptor positive tumors (luminal B) with increased lymph node involvement (p=0.0141). The immunohistologic criteria were validated on a different set of 359 cases treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which showed a pathologic complete response predominantly in ERBB2 and triple negative tumors. Immunohistochemistry is a reliable surrogate tool to classify breast carcinoma according to the gene expression profile classification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ki-67; Molecular classes; breast carcinoma; immunohistochemical surrogate markers

Year:  2009        PMID: 19294003      PMCID: PMC2655155     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  43 in total

1.  Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of the MIB-1 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1998-07-25       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 2.  Molecular classification of breast tumors: toward improved diagnostics and treatments.

Authors:  Therese Sørlie
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Monoclonal antibody Ki-67: its use in histopathology.

Authors:  D C Brown; K C Gatter
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  The important prognostic value of Ki-67 expression as determined by image analysis in breast cancer.

Authors:  T Pietiläinen; P Lipponen; S Aaltomaa; M Eskelinen; V M Kosma; K Syrjänen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers.

Authors:  C M Perou; S S Jeffrey; M van de Rijn; C A Rees; M B Eisen; D T Ross; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S X Zhu; J C Lee; D Lashkari; D Shalon; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparison of mitotic index, in vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling, and MIB-1 assays to quantitate proliferation in breast cancer.

Authors:  A D Thor; S Liu; D H Moore; S M Edgerton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  MIB1 proliferation index in breast infiltrating carcinoma: comparison with other proliferative markers and association with new biological prognostic factors.

Authors:  M C González-Vela; M F Garijo; F Fernández; J F Val-Bernal
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Tumor proliferative activity and response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A Bonetti; M Zaninelli; S Rodella; A Molino; L Sperotto; Q Piubello; F Bonetti; R Nortilli; M Turazza; G L Cetto
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Breast lesions in black women.

Authors:  J Kovi; S Mohla; H J Norris; C C Sampson; M Y Heshmat
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1989
View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alexandre Cochet; Bruno Coudert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Salim Kanoun; François Brunotte; Pierre Fumoleau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-05

2.  Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality by Molecular Subtype: Statewide Age and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in New Jersey.

Authors:  Aishwarya Kulkarni; Antoinette M Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Stephanie M Hill; Jesse J Plascak; Adana A M Llanos
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2019-08-19

3.  Real-World Outcomes Among Older Mexican Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paula Cabrera-Galeana; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Nancy Reynoso-Noveron; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Fernando Lara-Medina; Alberto Alvarado-Miranda; José Rodrigo Espinosa-Fernandez; Nereida Esparza-Arias; Alejandro Mohar; Juan Enrique Bargallo-Rocha
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-04-28

4.  Very low prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression and gene amplification in Saudi breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mohamed A Shawarby; Dalal M Al-Tamimi; Ayesha Ahmed
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Aberrant expression of LMO4 induces centrosome amplification and mitotic spindle abnormalities in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Marjorie E Montañez-Wiscovich; Melissa D Shelton; Darcie D Seachrist; Kristen L Lozada; Emhonta Johnson; John D Miedler; Fadi W Abdul-Karim; Jane E Visvader; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Luminal breast cancer classification according to proliferative indices: clinicopathological characteristics and short-term survival analysis.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Gang Nie; Zhimin Wei; Zhidong Lv; Xiaoyi Liu; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Germline mutations and polymorphisms in the origins of cancers in women.

Authors:  Kim M Hirshfield; Timothy R Rebbeck; Arnold J Levine
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 4.375

8.  Invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin production and HER-2 overexpression: a case report and further case studies.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Rohit Bhargava; David J Dabbs
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Protein expression profile and prevalence pattern of the molecular classes of breast cancer--a Saudi population based study.

Authors:  Dalal M Al Tamimi; Mohamed A Shawarby; Ayesha Ahmed; Ammar K Hassan; Amal A AlOdaini
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Prosigna® breast cancer assay: histopathologic correlation, development, and assessment of size, nodal status, Ki-67 (SiNK™) index for breast cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Swikrity Upadhyay Baskota; David J Dabbs; Beth Z Clark; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.