BACKGROUND: Breast cancers which demonstrate EGFR protein expression, gene amplification and/or gene mutations may benefit therapeutically from tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In Western studies, EGFR protein expression has been demonstrated in 7-36% of breast cancer patients, while gene amplification has been found in around 6% of cases and mutations were either absent or extremely rare. Studies addressing EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in Saudi breast cancer patients are extremely scanty and the results reported have been mostly non-conclusive. Herein we report the prevalence of EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in a cohort of Saudi breast cancer patients. FINDINGS: We noticed a remarkably low incidence of EGFR protein expression (1.3%) while analyzing the spectrum of molecular subtypes of breast cancer in a Saudi population by immunohistochemistry. Also, EGFR gene amplification could not be demonstrated in any of 231 cases studied using silver enhanced in situ hybridization. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely low incidence of EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in Saudi breast cancer patients as compared to Western populations is most probably ethnically related as supported by our previous finding in the same cohort of a spectrum of molecular breast cancer types that is unique to the Saudi population and in stark contrast with Western and other regionally based studies. Further support to this view is provided by earlier studies from Saudi Arabia that have similarly shown variability in molecular breast cancer subtype distribution between Saudi and Caucasian populations as well as a predominance of the high-grade pathway in breast cancer development in Middle East women. More studies on EGFR in breast cancer are needed from different regions of Saudi Arabia before our assumption can be confirmed, however.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancers which demonstrate EGFR protein expression, gene amplification and/or gene mutations may benefit therapeutically from tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In Western studies, EGFR protein expression has been demonstrated in 7-36% of breast cancerpatients, while gene amplification has been found in around 6% of cases and mutations were either absent or extremely rare. Studies addressing EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in Saudi breast cancerpatients are extremely scanty and the results reported have been mostly non-conclusive. Herein we report the prevalence of EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in a cohort of Saudi breast cancerpatients. FINDINGS: We noticed a remarkably low incidence of EGFR protein expression (1.3%) while analyzing the spectrum of molecular subtypes of breast cancer in a Saudi population by immunohistochemistry. Also, EGFR gene amplification could not be demonstrated in any of 231 cases studied using silver enhanced in situ hybridization. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely low incidence of EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in Saudi breast cancerpatients as compared to Western populations is most probably ethnically related as supported by our previous finding in the same cohort of a spectrum of molecular breast cancer types that is unique to the Saudi population and in stark contrast with Western and other regionally based studies. Further support to this view is provided by earlier studies from Saudi Arabia that have similarly shown variability in molecular breast cancer subtype distribution between Saudi and Caucasian populations as well as a predominance of the high-grade pathway in breast cancer development in Middle East women. More studies on EGFR in breast cancer are needed from different regions of Saudi Arabia before our assumption can be confirmed, however.
Authors: Clement A Adebamowo; Ayotunde Famooto; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Toyin Aniagwu; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Effiong E Akang Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Rohit Bhargava; William L Gerald; Allan R Li; Qiulu Pan; Priti Lal; Marc Ladanyi; Beiyun Chen Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Rohit Bhargava; Joan Striebel; Sushil Beriwal; John C Flickinger; Agnieszka Onisko; Gretchen Ahrendt; David J Dabbs Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2009-02-09
Authors: Suad M Bin Amer; Zakia Maqbool; Maimoona S Nirmal; Amal T Qattan; Syed S Hussain; Hatim A Jeprel; Asma M Tulbah; Osama A Malik; Taher A Al-Tweigeri Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: William Pao; Vincent Miller; Maureen Zakowski; Jennifer Doherty; Katerina Politi; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bhuvanesh Singh; Robert Heelan; Valerie Rusch; Lucinda Fulton; Elaine Mardis; Doris Kupfer; Richard Wilson; Mark Kris; Harold Varmus Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael F Press; Richard S Finn; David Cameron; Angelo Di Leo; Charles E Geyer; Ivonne E Villalobos; Angela Santiago; Roberta Guzman; Armen Gasparyan; Yanling Ma; Kathy Danenberg; Anne Marie Martin; Lisa Williams; Cristina Oliva; Steven Stein; Robert Gagnon; Michael Arbushites; Maria T Koehler Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dalal M Al-Tamimi; Philip S Bernard; Mohamed A Shawarby; Ali M Al-Amri; Maha Abdel Hadi Journal: Ultrastruct Pathol Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.094
Authors: Jorge S Reis-Filho; Fernanda Milanezi; Silvia Carvalho; Pete T Simpson; Dawn Steele; Kay Savage; Maryou B K Lambros; Emilio M Pereira; Jahn M Nesland; Sunil R Lakhani; Fernando C Schmitt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-10-25 Impact factor: 6.466