Literature DB >> 19292004

Range and modulation dependencies for proton beam dose per monitor unit calculations.

Wen C Hsi1, Andries N Schreuder, Michael F Moyers, Chris E Allgower, Jonathan B Farr, Anthony E Mascia.   

Abstract

Calculations of dose per monitor unit (D/MU) are required in addition to measurements to increase patient safety in the clinical practice of proton radiotherapy. As in conventional photon and electron therapy, the D/MU depends on several factors. This study focused on obtaining range and modulation dependence factors used in D/MU calculations for the double scattered proton beam line at the Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute. Three dependencies on range and one dependency on modulation were found. A carefully selected set of measurements was performed to discern these individual dependencies. Dependencies on range were due to: (1) the stopping power of the protons passing through the monitor chamber; (2) the reduction of proton fluence due to nuclear interactions within the patient; and (3) the variation of proton fluence passing through the monitor chamber due to different source-to-axis distances (SADs) for different beam ranges. Different SADs are produced by reconfigurations of beamline elements to provide different field sizes and ranges. The SAD effect on the D/MU varies smoothly as the beam range is varied, except at the beam range for which the first scatterers are exchanged and relocated to accommodate low and high beam ranges. A geometry factor was devised to model the SAD variation effect on the D/MU. The measured D/MU variation as a function of range can be predicted within 1% using the three modeled dependencies on range. Investigation of modulated beams showed that an analytical formula can predict the D/MU dependency as a function of modulation to within 1.5%. Special attention must be applied when measuring the D/MU dependence on modulation to avoid interplay between range and SAD effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19292004      PMCID: PMC2673673          DOI: 10.1118/1.3056466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Dosimetry techniques for narrow proton beam radiosurgery.

Authors:  S M Vatnitsky; D W Miller; M F Moyers; R P Levy; R W Schulte; J D Slater; J M Slater
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monitor unit calculations for range-modulated spread-out Bragg peak fields.

Authors:  Hanne M Kooy; Matthew Schaefer; Skip Rosenthal; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A general solution to charged particle beam flattening using an optimized dual-scattering-foil technique, with application to proton therapy beams.

Authors:  E Grusell; A Montelius; A Brahme; G Rikner; K Russell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Neutron scattered dose equivalent to a fetus from proton radiotherapy of the mother.

Authors:  Geraldine Mesoloras; George A Sandison; Robert D Stewart; Jonathan B Farr; Wen C Hsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Spread-out Bragg peak and monitor units calculation with the Monte Carlo code MCNPX.

Authors:  J Hérault; N Iborra; B Serrano; P Chauvel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Monte Carlo calculations for absolute dosimetry to determine machine outputs for proton therapy fields.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Energy spectrum control for modulated proton beams.

Authors:  Wen C Hsi; Michael F Moyers; Dmitri Nichiporov; Vladimir Anferov; Mark Wolanski; Chris E Allgower; Jonathan B Farr; Anthony E Mascia; Andries N Schreuder
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  An analytical approximation of depth-dose distributions for therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  T Bortfeld; W Schlegel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Experiences with an application of industrial robotics for accurate patient positioning in proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  C E Allgower; A N Schreuder; J B Farr; A E Mascia
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.547

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical Implementation of a Proton Dose Verification System Utilizing a GPU Accelerated Monte Carlo Engine.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; H Wan Chan Tseung; Kurt E Augustine; Martin Bues; Daniel W Mundy; Timothy J Walsh; Michael G Herman; Nadia N Laack
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-12-30

2.  Comparability of three output prediction models for a compact passively double-scattered proton therapy system.

Authors:  Sven Ferguson; Yong Chen; Clara Ferreira; Mohammad Islam; Vance P Keeling; Andy Lau; Salahuddin Ahmad; Hosang Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  MR-based CT metal artifact reduction for head-and-neck photon, electron, and proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Scharff Nielsen; Koen Van Leemput; Jens Morgenthaler Edmund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Implementation of an improved dose-per-MU model for double-scattered proton beams to address interbeamline modulation width variability.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; JiaJian Shen; Christopher G Ainsley; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.