Literature DB >> 1928779

Distribution of catheter-injected local anesthetic in a model of the subarachnoid space.

M L Rigler1, K Drasner.   

Abstract

Maldistribution of local anesthetic administered through a subarachnoid catheter recently has been implicated as a possible cause of sacral root injury. To examine subarachnoid distribution of catheter-injected local anesthetic, we constructed a model of the subarachnoid space and administered solutions containing lidocaine and methylene blue through sacrally directed catheters. We studied three catheters: a 28-G endport, a 20-G endport, and a 20-G multiple sideport. To determine the injection rates to be used, ten clinicians were observed while they performed mock subarachnoid injections: the mean (+/- standard deviation) "normal" injection times for the 28-G and 20-G catheters were 52.6 +/- 17.2 and 11.9 +/- 7.2 s, respectively. The correlation coefficient for lidocaine concentration estimated by methylene blue spectrophotometric absorbance and measured by immunoassay was 0.977. Administration of hyperbaric local anesthetic through a sacrally directed catheter resulted in restricted distribution of anesthetic with a relatively high peak concentration. Rate of injection was a critical factor affecting distribution; faster injections tended to distribute solution more uniformly and to a higher segmental level, resulting in substantially lower peak concentrations. When catheters were injected at clinically relevant rates, the 28-G catheter produced the greatest degree of maldistribution; this difference appeared to be primarily a function of flow rate. Differences in peak lidocaine concentration between the two 20-G catheters were neither large nor consistent. However, despite sacral placement, the multiple-sideport catheter distributed anesthetic toward "higher" spinal segments more consistently. Distribution was more favorable when the injected solution was less dense (closer to isobaric).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1928779     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199110000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  8 in total

1.  Research on local anesthetic neurotoxicity using intrathecal and epidural rat models.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Clinical dose of lidocaine destroys the cell membrane and induces both necrosis and apoptosis in an identified Lymnaea neuron.

Authors:  Shin Onizuka; Ryuji Tamura; Tetsu Yonaha; Nobuko Oda; Yuko Kawasaki; Tetsuro Shirasaka; Seiji Shiraishi; Isao Tsuneyoshi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A directional needle improves effectiveness and reduces complications of microcatheter continuous spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  T Standl; S Eckert; I Rundshagen; J Schulte am Esch
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Neurotoxicity of lidocaine--does it exist?

Authors:  M J Douglas
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  [Spread of hyperbaric local anesthetics in a spinal canal model. The influence of Trendelenburg position and spinal configuration].

Authors:  V C Valencia Chavez; H Baumann; J Biscoping
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  P Morgan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Large intrathecal volume: a cause of true failed spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Joan E Spiegel; Philip Hess
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Bilateral leg pain following lidocaine spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  G R Pinczower; H S Chadwick; R Woodland; M Lowmiller
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.063

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.