Literature DB >> 8595694

Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics.

P Morgan1.   

Abstract

Spinal anaesthesia has been used since the 1800s but, due to a number of complications, the popularity of this technique has waxed and waned. In the 1950s, it was the most widely used method of anaesthesia and analgesia in obstetrics but it fell out of fashion with the arrival of the epidural technique which allowed a continuous method of delivering analgesia with relatively few complications. Hypotension and the high incidence of postdural puncture headaches were two reasons for the decline in the popularity of spinal anaesthesia in the young, otherwise healthy pregnant population. With the development of newer needles and bevel designs and methods whereby the incidence of hypotension can be minimized, spinal anaesthesia is making a reappearance in obstetrical anaesthesia spheres. The purpose of this article is to review the history, effects, technique, indications, contraindications and complications of this method of anesthesia as it applies to the obstetrical patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8595694     DOI: 10.1007/BF03015105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  128 in total

1.  An evaluation of a combined spinal/epidural needle set utilising a 26-gauge, pencil point spinal needle for caesarean section.

Authors:  J L Westbrook; F Donald; L E Carrie
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Unintentional dural puncture and prophylactic epidural blood patch in obstetrics.

Authors:  P Colonna-Romano; B E Shapiro
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with Cesarean section.

Authors:  R B Clark; D S Thompson; C H Thompson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Transient neurologic toxicity after hyperbaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 5% lidocaine.

Authors:  M Schneider; T Ettlin; M Kaufmann; P Schumacher; A Urwyler; K Hampl; A von Hochstetter
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Aseptic meningitis following spinal anesthesia--a complication of the past?

Authors:  A A Bert; L H Laasberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Incremental spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: maternal and fetal haemodynamic effects.

Authors:  S C Robson; G Samsoon; R J Boys; C Rodeck; B Morgan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Epidural anesthesia for obstetrics after spinal surgery.

Authors:  M D Daley; S H Rolbin; E M Hew; B A Morningstar; J A Stewart
Journal:  Reg Anesth       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

8.  Subarachnoid anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine: effects of density.

Authors:  I W Møller; A Fernandes; H H Edström
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Perioperative analgesia with subarachnoid sufentanil administration.

Authors:  M A Courtney; A M Bader; B Hartwell; M Hauch; M J Grennan; S Datta
Journal:  Reg Anesth       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct

10.  Bilateral leg pain following lidocaine spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  G R Pinczower; H S Chadwick; R Woodland; M Lowmiller
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prospective, randomized, comparative study of Misgav Ladach versus traditional cesarean section at Nazareth Hospital, Kenya.

Authors:  L Ansaloni; R Brundisini; G Morino; A Kiura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Adenekan At; Olateju So
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10

3.  Dexamethasone versus a combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron as prophylactic antiemetic in patients receiving intrathecal morphine for caesarean section.

Authors:  Akpan Imeh; Oladapo Olaniyi; Olateju Simeon; Odusoga Omotola
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Abdominal girth and vertebral column length aid in predicting intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose for elective cesarean section.

Authors:  Chang-Na Wei; Qing-He Zhou; Li-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Effect of Sequential Compression Device on Hemodynamic Changes After Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fatemeh Javaherforooshzadeh; Mohammad Reza Pipelzadeh; Reza Akhondzadeh; Sara Adarvishi; Mostafa Alghozat
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-08-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.