Literature DB >> 19286205

Yearly prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination fluctuations in a screened population.

Donna Pauler Ankerst1, Ryan Miyamoto, Prakash Vijay Nair, Brad H Pollock, Ian M Thompson, Dipen J Parekh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate biopsy is often recommended based on increases in prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. We investigated the stability of a single positive test during the next 3 consecutive years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,578 participants in a San Antonio screening cohort with 2 or more consecutive annual prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination tests were identified. Occurrences of an increased prostate specific antigen (2.5 ng/ml or greater) followed by 1 or more nonincreased prostate specific antigen results were compared with similar fluctuations of digital rectal examination from abnormal to normal.
RESULTS: In 2,272 men who did not have a biopsy during the study, in 23.3% of 744 incidences of an increased prostate specific antigen with 1 year of followup, the next prostate specific antigen was not increased. In 19.5% of 462 incidences of an increased prostate specific antigen with 2 years of followup, the next 2 consecutive prostate specific antigen levels were not increased. Finally, in 17.5% of 285 incidences of an increased prostate specific antigen with 3 years of followup, the next 3 consecutive prostate specific antigens were not increased. Rates were similar but lower in 221 men with 1 or more negative biopsies during the study and in 85 men in whom prostate cancer eventually developed during the study. In contrast, approximately 70% of abnormal digital rectal examinations were normal the following year even in patients with prostate cancer, and in the majority of incidences remained normal the next 2 to 3 consecutive years.
CONCLUSIONS: Occurrences of reversed prostate specific antigen cut point or abnormal digital rectal examination based decisions to biopsy 1 or more years after the initial test are not uncommon, suggesting repetition of these tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19286205      PMCID: PMC3677190          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer: achievements and presentation.

Authors:  M J Roobol; F H Schröder
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; David L Levin; E David Crawford; Edward P Gelmann; Paul F Pinsky; David Chia; Barnett S Kramer; Douglas Reding; Timothy R Church; Robert L Grubb; Grant Izmirlian; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Biological variation of prostate specific antigen levels in serum: an evaluation of day-to-day physiological fluctuations in a well-defined cohort of 24 patients.

Authors:  R G Nixon; M H Wener; K M Smith; R E Parson; S A Strobel; M K Brawer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Variation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels: an evaluation of year-to-year fluctuations.

Authors:  James A Eastham; Elyn Riedel; Peter T Scardino; Moshe Shike; Martin Fleisher; Arthur Schatzkin; Elaine Lanza; Lianne Latkany; Colin B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Leslie G Ford; Michael M Lieber; R Duane Cespedes; James N Atkins; Scott M Lippman; Susie M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Connie M Szczepanek; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature.

Authors:  L V Rodríguez; M K Terris
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C).

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; C B Brendler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Trends and co-trends of prostate-specific antigen and body mass index in a screened population.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Brad H Pollock; Yuanyuan Liang; Nidzara Dizdarevic; Sergiy Kyrylenko; Andreas Boeck; Ian M Thompson; Robin Leach
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Andreas Boeck; Stephen J Freedland; J Stephen Jones; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; Michael W Kattan; Eric A Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja; Andrew J Vickers; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  What happens after an elevated PSA test: the experience of 13,591 veterans.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Richard M Hoffman; Ruth Etzioni; Van Anh T Ginger; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Serial Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen in Combination with Prostate Specific Antigen for Population Based Early Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Donna Pauler Ankerst; Jonathan Gelfond; Martin Goros; Jesus Herrera; Andreas Strobl; Ian M Thompson; Javier Hernandez; Robin J Leach
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Management of elevated prostate-specific antigen in men with nonbacterial chronic prostatitis.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Prostate cancer screening trends in a large, integrated health care system.

Authors:  Lauren Wallner; Stanley Frencher; Jin-Wen Hsu; Ronald Loo; Joice Huang; Michael Nichol; Steven Jacobsen
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012

8.  Does a screening digital rectal exam provide actionable clinical utility in patients with an elevated PSA and positive MRI?

Authors:  Courtney M Chang; Andrew G McIntosh; Daniel D Shapiro; John W Davis; John F Ward; Justin R Gregg
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-05-04

9.  A Model to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Integrating Urinary Peptide and Extracellular Vesicle RNA Data.

Authors:  Shea P O'Connell; Maria Frantzi; Agnieszka Latosinska; Martyn Webb; William Mullen; Martin Pejchinovski; Mark Salji; Harald Mischak; Colin S Cooper; Jeremy Clark; Daniel S Brewer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.575

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.