| Literature DB >> 19285310 |
Wim Notebaert1, Femke Houtman, Filip Van Opstal, Wim Gevers, Wim Fias, Tom Verguts.
Abstract
It is generally assumed that slowing after errors is a cognitive control effect reflecting more careful response strategies after errors. However, clinical data are not compatible with this explanation. We therefore consider two alternative explanations, one referring to the possibility of a persisting underlying problem and one on the basis of the low frequency of errors (orienting account). This latter hypothesis argues that infrequent events orient attention away from the task. Support for the orienting account was obtained in two experiments. Using a new experimental procedure, Experiment 1 demonstrated post-error slowing after infrequent errors and post-correct slowing after infrequent correct trials. In Experiment 2, slowing was observed following infrequent irrelevant tones replacing the feedback signals.Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19285310 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cognition ISSN: 0010-0277