Literature DB >> 19283339

Design of compound libraries for fragment screening.

Niklas Blomberg1, David A Cosgrove, Peter W Kenny, Karin Kolmodin.   

Abstract

Approaches to the design of libraries for fragment screening are illustrated with reference to a 20 k generic fragment screening library and a 1.2 k generic NMR screening library. Tools and methods for library design that have been developed within AstraZeneca are described, including Foyfi fingerprints and the Flush program for neighborhood characterization. It will be shown how Flush and the BigPicker, which selects maximally diverse sets of compounds, are used to apply the Core and Layer method for library design. Approaches to partitioning libraries into cocktails are also described.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19283339     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-009-9264-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  37 in total

1.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery?

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Robin Carr; Chris Murray; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Statistical tools for virtual screening.

Authors:  Jennifer R Krumrine; Andrew T Maynard; Charles L Lerman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  H J Böhm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Small molecule shape-fingerprints.

Authors:  James A Haigh; Barry T Pickup; J Andrew Grant; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Multifingerprint based similarity searches for targeted class compound selection.

Authors:  Thierry Kogej; Ola Engkvist; Niklas Blomberg; Sorel Muresan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Discovery of a novel warhead against beta-secretase through fragment-based lead generation.

Authors:  Stefan Geschwindner; Lise-Lotte Olsson; Jeffrey S Albert; Johanna Deinum; Philip D Edwards; Tonny de Beer; Rutger H A Folmer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Fragment-based activity space: smaller is better.

Authors:  Thomas Hesterkamp; Mark Whittaker
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  High throughput solubility determination with application to selection of compounds for fragment screening.

Authors:  Nicola Colclough; Alison Hunter; Peter W Kenny; Rod S Kittlety; Lynsey Lobedan; Kin Y Tam; Mark A Timms
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Functionality maps of binding sites: a multiple copy simultaneous search method.

Authors:  A Miranker; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1991

10.  Novel prostaglandin D synthase inhibitors generated by fragment-based drug design.

Authors:  Morten Hohwy; Loredana Spadola; Britta Lundquist; Paul Hawtin; Jan Dahmén; Ib Groth-Clausen; Ewa Nilsson; Sofia Persdotter; Karin von Wachenfeldt; Rutger H A Folmer; Karl Edman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  12 in total

1.  Automated molecule editing in molecular design.

Authors:  Peter W Kenny; Carlos A Montanari; Igor M Prokopczyk; Fernanda A Sala; Geraldo Rodrigues Sartori
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Identifying ligand-binding hot spots in proteins using brominated fragments.

Authors:  Morten K Grøftehauge; Martin Ø Therkelsen; Rolf Taaning; Troels Skrydstrup; J Preben Morth; Poul Nissen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2013-08-19

3.  Design of a multi-purpose fragment screening library using molecular complexity and orthogonal diversity metrics.

Authors:  Wan F Lau; Jane M Withka; David Hepworth; Thomas V Magee; Yuhua J Du; Gregory A Bakken; Michael D Miller; Zachary S Hendsch; Venkataraman Thanabal; Steve A Kolodziej; Li Xing; Qiyue Hu; Lakshmi S Narasimhan; Robert Love; Maura E Charlton; Samantha Hughes; Willem P van Hoorn; James E Mills
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Ligand efficiency metrics considered harmful.

Authors:  Peter W Kenny; Andrei Leitão; Carlos A Montanari
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Symmetric kv1.5 blockers discovered by focused screening.

Authors:  Jonas Boström
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Design of a fragment library that maximally represents available chemical space.

Authors:  M N Schulz; J Landström; K Bright; R E Hubbard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  ClogP(alk): a method for predicting alkane/water partition coefficient.

Authors:  Peter W Kenny; Carlos A Montanari; Igor M Prokopczyk
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  A chemogenomic analysis of ionization constants--implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  David T Manallack; Richard J Prankerd; Gemma C Nassta; Oleg Ursu; Tudor I Oprea; David K Chalmers
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics.

Authors:  Jiangming Sun; Nina Jeliazkova; Vladimir Chupakin; Jose-Felipe Golib-Dzib; Ola Engkvist; Lars Carlsson; Jörg Wegner; Hugo Ceulemans; Ivan Georgiev; Vedrin Jeliazkov; Nikolay Kochev; Thomas J Ashby; Hongming Chen
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  The nature of ligand efficiency.

Authors:  Peter W Kenny
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.