Literature DB >> 21604056

Design of a multi-purpose fragment screening library using molecular complexity and orthogonal diversity metrics.

Wan F Lau1, Jane M Withka, David Hepworth, Thomas V Magee, Yuhua J Du, Gregory A Bakken, Michael D Miller, Zachary S Hendsch, Venkataraman Thanabal, Steve A Kolodziej, Li Xing, Qiyue Hu, Lakshmi S Narasimhan, Robert Love, Maura E Charlton, Samantha Hughes, Willem P van Hoorn, James E Mills.   

Abstract

Fragment Based Drug Discovery (FBDD) continues to advance as an efficient and alternative screening paradigm for the identification and optimization of novel chemical matter. To enable FBDD across a wide range of pharmaceutical targets, a fragment screening library is required to be chemically diverse and synthetically expandable to enable critical decision making for chemical follow-up and assessing new target druggability. In this manuscript, the Pfizer fragment library design strategy which utilized multiple and orthogonal metrics to incorporate structure, pharmacophore and pharmacological space diversity is described. Appropriate measures of molecular complexity were also employed to maximize the probability of detection of fragment hits using a variety of biophysical and biochemical screening methods. In addition, structural integrity, purity, solubility, fragment and analog availability as well as cost were important considerations in the selection process. Preliminary analysis of primary screening results for 13 targets using NMR Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) indicates the identification of uM-mM hits and the uniqueness of hits at weak binding affinities for these targets.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604056     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9434-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  43 in total

1.  Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic compounds with QSPR approach.

Authors:  Hua Gao; Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram; Pil Lee
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.

Authors:  Ansgar Schuffenhauer; Philipp Floersheim; Pierre Acklin; Edgar Jacoby
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

3.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery?

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Robin Carr; Chris Murray; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection.

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; Colin R Groom; Alexander Alex
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 7.851

5.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Predicting protein druggability.

Authors:  Philip J Hajduk; Jeffrey R Huth; Christin Tse
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Global mapping of pharmacological space.

Authors:  Gaia V Paolini; Richard H B Shapland; Willem P van Hoorn; Jonathan S Mason; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  SPR-based fragment screening: advantages and applications.

Authors:  T Neumann; H-D Junker; K Schmidt; R Sekul
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Adding calorimetric data to decision making in lead discovery: a hot tip.

Authors:  John E Ladbury; Gerhard Klebe; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Combinatorial library-based design with Basis Products.

Authors:  Joe Zhongxiang Zhou; Shenghua Shi; Jim Na; Zhengwei Peng; Tom Thacher
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery.

Authors:  Daniel A Erlanson; Stephen W Fesik; Roderick E Hubbard; Wolfgang Jahnke; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Novel isoquinolone PDK1 inhibitors discovered through fragment-based lead discovery.

Authors:  M Catherine Johnson; Qiyue Hu; Laura Lingardo; Rose Ann Ferre; Samantha Greasley; Jiangli Yan; John Kath; Ping Chen; Jacques Ermolieff; Gordon Alton
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Design of a fragment library that maximally represents available chemical space.

Authors:  M N Schulz; J Landström; K Bright; R E Hubbard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Binding screen for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator correctors finds new chemical matter and yields insights into cystic fibrosis therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Justin D Hall; Hong Wang; Laura J Byrnes; Suman Shanker; Kelong Wang; Ivan V Efremov; P Andrew Chong; Julie D Forman-Kay; Ann E Aulabaugh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Fragment Libraries Designed to Be Functionally Diverse Recover Protein Binding Information More Efficiently Than Standard Structurally Diverse Libraries.

Authors:  Anna Carbery; Rachael Skyner; Frank von Delft; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 8.039

6.  DMSO Solubility Assessment for Fragment-Based Screening.

Authors:  Shamkhal Baybekov; Gilles Marcou; Pascal Ramos; Olivier Saurel; Jean-Luc Galzi; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Increasing chemical space coverage by combining empirical and computational fragment screens.

Authors:  Sarah Barelier; Oliv Eidam; Inbar Fish; Johan Hollander; Francis Figaroa; Ruta Nachane; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet; Gregg Siegal
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 8.  Current perspectives in fragment-based lead discovery (FBLD).

Authors:  Bas Lamoree; Roderick E Hubbard
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 8.000

9.  NMR quality control of fragment libraries for screening.

Authors:  Sridhar Sreeramulu; Christian Richter; Till Kuehn; Kamal Azzaoui; Marcel Jules José Blommers; Rebecca Del Conte; Marco Fragai; Nils Trieloff; Peter Schmieder; Marc Nazaré; Edgar Specker; Vladimir Ivanov; Hartmut Oschkinat; Lucia Banci; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.835

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.