Literature DB >> 19276345

Dose-response relationships for N7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine induced by low-dose [14C]ethylene oxide: evidence for a novel mechanism of endogenous adduct formation.

Debbie A Marsden1, Donald J L Jones, Robert G Britton, Ted Ognibene, Esther Ubick, George E Johnson, Peter B Farmer, Karen Brown.   

Abstract

Ethylene oxide (EO) is widely used in the chemical industry and is also formed in humans through the metabolic oxidation of ethylene, generated during physiologic processes. EO is classified as a human carcinogen and is a direct acting alkylating agent, primarily forming N7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (N7-HEG). To conduct accurate human risk assessments, it is vital to ascertain the relative contribution of endogenously versus exogenously derived DNA damage and identify the sources of background lesions. We have therefore defined in vivo dose-response relationships over a concentration range relevant to human EO exposures using a dual-isotope approach. By combining liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography-accelerator mass spectrometry analysis, both the endogenous and exogenous N7-HEG adducts were quantified in tissues of [(14)C]EO-treated rats. Levels of [(14)C]N7-HEG induced in spleen, liver, and stomach DNA increased in a linear manner from 0.002 to 4 adducts/10(8) nucleotides. More importantly, the extent of damage arising through this route was insignificant compared with the background abundance of N7-HEG naturally present. However, at the two highest doses, [(14)C]EO exposure caused a significant increase in endogenous N7-HEG formation in liver and spleen, suggesting that EO can induce physiologic pathways responsible for ethylene generation in vivo and thereby indirectly promote N7-HEG production. We present evidence for a novel mechanism of adduct formation to explain this phenomenon, involving oxidative stress and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as a potential biosynthetic precursor to ethylene in mammalian cells. Based on the proposed pathway, N7-HEG may have potential as a biomarker of cellular oxidative stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276345     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  9 in total

Review 1.  Accelerator mass spectrometry-enabled studies: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Ali Arjomand
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Endogenous versus exogenous DNA adducts: their role in carcinogenesis, epidemiology, and risk assessment.

Authors:  James A Swenberg; Kun Lu; Benjamin C Moeller; Lina Gao; Patricia B Upton; Jun Nakamura; Thomas B Starr
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Kras, Egfr, and Tp53 Mutations in B6C3F1/N Mouse and F344/NTac Rat Alveolar/Bronchiolar Carcinomas Resulting from Chronic Inhalation Exposure to Cobalt Metal.

Authors:  Hue-Hua L Hong; Mark J Hoenerhoff; Thai-Vu Ton; Ronald A Herbert; Grace E Kissling; Michelle J Hooth; Mamta Behl; Kristine L Witt; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Robert C Sills; Arun R Pandiri
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  Human microdosing for the prediction of patient response.

Authors:  Paul T Henderson; Chong-Xian Pan
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  The role of endogenous versus exogenous sources in the exposome of putative genotoxins and consequences for risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Arand Michael; Hermann M Bolt; Bourdoux Siméon; Hartwig Andrea; Hinrichsen Nils; Kalisch Christine; Mally Angela; Pellegrino Gloria; Ribera Daniel; Thatcher Natalie; Eisenbrand Gerhard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 7.  Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Authors:  Joanna Klapacz; Lynn H Pottenger; Bevin P Engelward; Christopher D Heinen; George E Johnson; Rebecca A Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Yeyejide Adeleye; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.657

8.  The vanishing zero revisited: thresholds in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Helmut Zarbl; Michael A Gallo; James Glick; Ka Yee Yeung; Paul Vouros
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.192

9.  Ethylene oxide in blood of ethylene-exposed B6C3F1 mice, Fischer 344 rats, and humans.

Authors:  Johannes Georg Filser; Winfried Kessler; Anna Artati; Eva Erbach; Thomas Faller; Paul Erich Kreuzer; Qiang Li; Josef Lichtmannegger; Wanwiwa Numtip; Dominik Klein; Christian Pütz; Brigitte Semder; György András Csanády
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.849

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.