PURPOSE: To quantify the cooling effect of hepatic vessels on liver radiofrequency (RF) ablation ex situ. METHODS: Bipolar RF applicators (diameter = 1.8 mm, electrode length = 30 mm) were inserted parallel to perfused glass tubes (diameter = 5 and 10 mm; flow = 250-1,800 ml/min) at distances of 5 and 10 mm in porcine livers ex vivo. RF ablation was performed at 30 W/15 kJ. RF lesions were analyzed by measuring the maximum (r (max)) and minimum radius (r (min)) and the lesion area. RESULTS: Glass tubes without flow showed no influence on RF lesions, whereas perfused glass tubes had a significant cooling effect on lesions. r (min) was reduced to 50% at 5 mm applicator-to-vessel distance and the lesion area was reduced from 407 to 321 mm(2) (p < 0.001). There was no significant influence of glass tube diameter or flow volume on any of the analyzed parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Cooling effects of intrahepatic vessels could be simulated in an ex situ model. Cooling effects should be taken into account in RF ablation within 10 mm distance to major liver vessels regardless of blood flow volume or vessel diameter. Surgical RF ablation with temporary blood flow occlusion should be considered in such constellations.
PURPOSE: To quantify the cooling effect of hepatic vessels on liver radiofrequency (RF) ablation ex situ. METHODS: Bipolar RF applicators (diameter = 1.8 mm, electrode length = 30 mm) were inserted parallel to perfused glass tubes (diameter = 5 and 10 mm; flow = 250-1,800 ml/min) at distances of 5 and 10 mm in porcine livers ex vivo. RF ablation was performed at 30 W/15 kJ. RF lesions were analyzed by measuring the maximum (r (max)) and minimum radius (r (min)) and the lesion area. RESULTS: Glass tubes without flow showed no influence on RF lesions, whereas perfused glass tubes had a significant cooling effect on lesions. r (min) was reduced to 50% at 5 mm applicator-to-vessel distance and the lesion area was reduced from 407 to 321 mm(2) (p < 0.001). There was no significant influence of glass tube diameter or flow volume on any of the analyzed parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Cooling effects of intrahepatic vessels could be simulated in an ex situ model. Cooling effects should be taken into account in RF ablation within 10 mm distance to major liver vessels regardless of blood flow volume or vessel diameter. Surgical RF ablation with temporary blood flow occlusion should be considered in such constellations.
Authors: Joerg-P Ritz; Kai S Lehmann; Christoph Isbert; Christoph Reissfelder; Thomas Albrecht; Thomas Stein; Heinz J Buhr Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2005-12-19 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Bernd B Frericks; Jörg P Ritz; Thomas Albrecht; Steffi Valdeig; Andrea Schenk; Karl-Jürgen Wolf; Kai Lehmann Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: S B Chinn; F T Lee; G D Kennedy; C Chinn; C D Johnson; T C Winter; T F Warner; D M Mahvi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: David S K Lu; Steven S Raman; Piyaporn Limanond; Donya Aziz; James Economou; Ronald Busuttil; James Sayre Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Kai Siegfried Lehmann; Bernd Benedikt Frericks; Christoph Holmer; Andrea Schenk; Andreas Weihusen; Verena Knappe; Urte Zurbuchen; Heinz Otto Peitgen; Heinz Johannes Buhr; Jörg Peter Ritz Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Jörg-Peter Ritz; Kai S Lehmann; Thomas Schumann; Verena Knappe; Urte Zurbuchen; Heinz J Buhr; Christoph Holmer Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: T Kröger; T Pätz; I Altrogge; A Schenk; K S Lehmann; B B Frericks; J-P Ritz; H-O Peitgen; T Preusser Journal: Open Biomed Eng J Date: 2010-02-04
Authors: Franz G M Poch; Christina A Neizert; Ole Gemeinhardt; Beatrice Geyer; Katharina Eminger; Christian Rieder; Stefan M Niehues; Janis Vahldiek; Stefan F Thieme; Kai S Lehmann Journal: Innov Surg Sci Date: 2018-05-11
Authors: C A Neizert; H N C Do; M Zibell; C Rieder; D Sinden; S M Niehues; J L Vahldiek; K S Lehmann; F G M Poch Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-12 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: F G M Poch; C A Neizert; B Geyer; O Gemeinhardt; S M Niehues; J L Vahldiek; K K Bressem; K S Lehmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kristina I Ringe; Carolin Lutat; Christian Rieder; Andrea Schenk; Frank Wacker; Hans-Juergen Raatschen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240