BACKGROUND: Only monopolar systems have thus far been available for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors, whose application is restricted because of the incalculable energy flow, reduction of electrical tissue conduction, and limited lesion size. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel internally cooled bipolar radiofrequency application device under in vivo conditions and to compare the effect of this system on lesion size when combined with hepatic arterial microembolization or complete hepatic blood flow occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a porcine liver model, RFA (60 W, 12 min) was performed with either normal (n = 12), partially interrupted (arterial microembolization via a hepatic artery catheter n = 12) or completely interrupted hepatic perfusion (Pringle's maneuver, n = 12). RFA parameters (impedance, power output, temperature, applied energy) were determined continuously during therapy. RFA lesions were macroscopically assessed after liver dissection. RESULTS: Bipolar RFA induced clinical relevant ellipsoid thermal lesions without complications. Hepatic inflow occlusion led to a 4.3-fold increase in lesion volume after arterial microembolization and a 5.8-fold increase after complete interruption (7.4 cm(3)versus 31.9 cm(3)versus 42.6 cm(3), P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The novel bipolar RFA device is a safe and effective alternative to monopolar RFA-systems. Interrupting hepatic perfusion significantly increases lesion volumes in bipolar RFA. This beneficial effect can also be achieved in the percutaneous application mode by RFA combined with arterial microembolization via a hepatic artery catheter.
BACKGROUND: Only monopolar systems have thus far been available for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors, whose application is restricted because of the incalculable energy flow, reduction of electrical tissue conduction, and limited lesion size. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel internally cooled bipolar radiofrequency application device under in vivo conditions and to compare the effect of this system on lesion size when combined with hepatic arterial microembolization or complete hepatic blood flow occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a porcine liver model, RFA (60 W, 12 min) was performed with either normal (n = 12), partially interrupted (arterial microembolization via a hepatic artery catheter n = 12) or completely interrupted hepatic perfusion (Pringle's maneuver, n = 12). RFA parameters (impedance, power output, temperature, applied energy) were determined continuously during therapy. RFA lesions were macroscopically assessed after liver dissection. RESULTS: Bipolar RFA induced clinical relevant ellipsoid thermal lesions without complications. Hepatic inflow occlusion led to a 4.3-fold increase in lesion volume after arterial microembolization and a 5.8-fold increase after complete interruption (7.4 cm(3)versus 31.9 cm(3)versus 42.6 cm(3), P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The novel bipolar RFA device is a safe and effective alternative to monopolar RFA-systems. Interrupting hepatic perfusion significantly increases lesion volumes in bipolar RFA. This beneficial effect can also be achieved in the percutaneous application mode by RFA combined with arterial microembolization via a hepatic artery catheter.
Authors: K S Lehmann; J P Ritz; S Valdeig; V Knappe; A Schenk; A Weihusen; C Rieder; C Holmer; U Zurbuchen; P Hoffmann; H O Peitgen; H J Buhr; B B Frericks Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Jörg-Peter Ritz; Kai S Lehmann; Thomas Schumann; Verena Knappe; Urte Zurbuchen; Heinz J Buhr; Christoph Holmer Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Cui Yang; Nuh N Rahbari; Sören Torge Mees; Felix Schaab; Moritz Koch; Jürgen Weitz; Christoph Reissfelder Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Christoph Reissfelder; Nuh N Rahbari; L Urrutia Bejarano; Thomas Schmidt; Nikolas Kortes; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz; Moritz Koch Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Zhigang Wang; Isshaa Aarya; Mariana Gueorguieva; Dun Liu; Hongyan Luo; Luigi Manfredi; Lijun Wang; Donald McLean; Stuart Coleman; Stuart Brown; Alfred Cuschieri Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Kristina I Ringe; Carolin Lutat; Christian Rieder; Andrea Schenk; Frank Wacker; Hans-Juergen Raatschen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240