Literature DB >> 19273851

Recombination at DNA replication fork barriers is not universal and is differentially regulated by Swi1.

David W Pryce1, Soshila Ramayah, Alessa Jaendling, Ramsay J McFarlane.   

Abstract

DNA replication stress has been implicated in the etiology of genetic diseases, including cancers. It has been proposed that genomic sites that inhibit or slow DNA replication fork progression possess recombination hotspot activity and can form potential fragile sites. Here we used the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, to demonstrate that hotspot activity is not a universal feature of replication fork barriers (RFBs), and we propose that most sites within the genome that form RFBs do not have recombination hotspot activity under nonstressed conditions. We further demonstrate that Swi1, the TIMELESS homologue, differentially controls the recombination potential of RFBs, switching between being a suppressor and an activator of recombination in a site-specific fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19273851      PMCID: PMC2660728          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807739106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

Review 1.  The connection between transcription and genomic instability.

Authors:  Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Genome-wide distribution of DNA replication origins at A+T-rich islands in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Mónica Segurado; Alberto de Luis; Francisco Antequera
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  ATR regulates fragile site stability.

Authors:  Anne M Casper; Paul Nghiem; Martin F Arlt; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Gregor Krings; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Complex mechanism of site-specific DNA replication termination in fission yeast.

Authors:  Sandra Codlin; Jacob Z Dalgaard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1.

Authors:  Eishi Noguchi; Chiaki Noguchi; Li-Lin Du; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast.

Authors:  Eishi Noguchi; Chiaki Noguchi; W Hayes McDonald; John R Yates; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Andreas S Ivessa; Brian A Lenzmeier; Jessica B Bessler; Lara K Goudsouzian; Sandra L Schnakenberg; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Adam Watson; Daniel M Sheedy; Ben Martin; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  22 in total

1.  The DNA helicase Pfh1 promotes fork merging at replication termination sites to ensure genome stability.

Authors:  Roland Steinacher; Fekret Osman; Jacob Z Dalgaard; Alexander Lorenz; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  The Mcm complex: unwinding the mechanism of a replicative helicase.

Authors:  Matthew L Bochman; Anthony Schwacha
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Genome stability control by checkpoint regulation of tRNA gene transcription.

Authors:  Brett W Clelland; Michael C Schultz
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2010-09-23

4.  DNA replication through hard-to-replicate sites, including both highly transcribed RNA Pol II and Pol III genes, requires the S. pombe Pfh1 helicase.

Authors:  Nasim Sabouri; Karin R McDonald; Christopher J Webb; Ileana M Cristea; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Chromosome domain architecture and dynamic organization of the fission yeast genome.

Authors:  Takeshi Mizuguchi; Jemima Barrowman; Shiv I S Grewal
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Timeless-dependent DNA replication-coupled recombination promotes Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated herpesvirus episome maintenance and terminal repeat stability.

Authors:  Jayaraju Dheekollu; Horng-Shen Chen; Kenneth M Kaye; Paul M Lieberman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Rad3 decorates critical chromosomal domains with gammaH2A to protect genome integrity during S-Phase in fission yeast.

Authors:  Sophie Rozenzhak; Eva Mejía-Ramírez; Jessica S Williams; Lana Schaffer; Jennifer A Hammond; Steven R Head; Paul Russell
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Checkpoint-dependent and -independent roles of Swi3 in replication fork recovery and sister chromatid cohesion in fission yeast.

Authors:  Jordan B Rapp; Chiaki Noguchi; Mukund M Das; Lisa K Wong; Alison B Ansbach; Allyson M Holmes; Benoit Arcangioli; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Timeless protection of telomeres.

Authors:  Mariana C Gadaleta; Alberto González-Medina; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.