Literature DB >> 19271901

Homo economicus in visual search.

Vidhya Navalpakkam1, Christof Koch, Pietro Perona.   

Abstract

How do reward outcomes affect early visual performance? Previous studies found a suboptimal influence, but they ignored the non-linearity in how subjects perceived the reward outcomes. In contrast, we find that when the non-linearity is accounted for, humans behave optimally and maximize expected reward. Our subjects were asked to detect the presence of a familiar target object in a cluttered scene. They were rewarded according to their performance. We systematically varied the target frequency and the reward/penalty policy for detecting/missing the targets. We find that 1) decreasing the target frequency will decrease the detection rates, in accordance with the literature. 2) Contrary to previous studies, increasing the target detection rewards will compensate for target rarity and restore detection performance. 3) A quantitative model based on reward maximization accurately predicts human detection behavior in all target frequency and reward conditions; thus, reward schemes can be designed to obtain desired detection rates for rare targets. 4) Subjects quickly learn the optimal decision strategy; we propose a neurally plausible model that exhibits the same properties. Potential applications include designing reward schemes to improve detection of life-critical, rare targets (e.g., cancers in medical images).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271901     DOI: 10.1167/9.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  21 in total

1.  Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Leonardo Chelazzi; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Reward expectation regulates brain responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional words: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Di Wang; Liyan Ji
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; David N Brunelli; Joshua Rubinstein; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Christof Koch; Antonio Rangel; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

7.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

8.  Associated valence impacts early visual processing of letter strings: Evidence from ERPs in a cross-modal learning paradigm.

Authors:  Mareike Bayer; Annika Grass; Annekathrin Schacht
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good.

Authors:  Andreas Jarvstad; Ulrike Hahn; Simon K Rushton; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Suboptimal integration of reward magnitude and prior reward likelihood in categorical decisions by monkeys.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Vincent P Ferrera
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.