| Literature DB >> 19270792 |
Michael E Baker1, Barbara Ruggeri, L James Sprague, Colleen Eckhardt-Ludka, Jennifer Lapira, Ivan Wick, Laura Soverchia, Massimo Ubaldi, Alberta Maria Polzonetti-Magni, Doris Vidal-Dorsch, Steven Bay, Joseph R Gully, Jesus A Reyes, Kevin M Kelley, Daniel Schlenk, Ellen C Breen, Roman Sásik, Gary Hardiman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endocrine disruptors include plasticizers, pesticides, detergents, and pharmaceuticals. Turbot and other flatfish are used to characterize the presence of chemicals in the marine environment. Unfortunately, there are relatively few genes of turbot and other flatfish in GenBank, which limits the use of molecular tools such as microarrays and quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to study disruption of endocrine responses in sentinel fish captured by regulatory agencies.Entities:
Keywords: Danio rerio; Pleuronichthys verticalis; endocrine disruptors; flatfish; hornyhead turbot; microarray; multispecies array; nonylphenol; xenobiotics; xenoestrogens; zebrafish
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19270792 PMCID: PMC2649224 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1Flatfish (Pleuronectiformes) in an evolutionary context. Adapted from the phylogeny (Coleman 2004; Helfman et al. 1997). Tetraodontiformes (Fugu, Tetraodon) and Perciformes (cichlid, tilapia, sea bass, sea bream, perch) are close phylogenetic relatives of Pleuronectiformes (turbot, halibut, sole) (box 1). Cypriniformes (zebrafish) are distant phylogenetic relatives (box 2).
Characteristics of hornyhead turbots sampled.
| Location | Station ID | Sample ID | Sex | Cortisol (ng/mL) | Estradiol (pg/mL) | IGF (ng/mL) | Thyroxine (ng/mL) | Vitellogenin (ng/μg protein) | Morphology diagnosis | Lesion grade | Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCSD | 4041 | 3 | M | 8.0 | 58.1 | 16.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | Oocytes | Minimal | Stage 1 |
| OCSD | 4041 | 4 | M | 18.6 | 134.0 | 20.2 | 2.5 | 0.2 | Oocytes, macrophage aggregates | Minimal | Stage 1 |
| OCSD | 4041 | 6 | M | 89.4 | 90.8 | 17.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | None | NA | Stage 1 |
| LACSD | 4086 | 1 | M | 20.7 | 2.2 | 16.3 | 0.4 | 1.5 | Fibrous septa | Minimal | Stage 1 |
| LACSD | 4086 | 2 | M | 15.1 | 2.2 | 17.0 | 0.4 | 2.6 | Fibrous septa | Moderate | Stage 2 |
| LACSD | 4086 | 3 | M | 1.1 | 21.3 | 15.9 | 0.4 | 1.0 | None | NA | Stage 2 |
| LACSD | 4086 | 4 | M | 8.4 | 2.2 | 17.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 | Oocytes, fibrous septa | Moderate | Stage 1 |
Abbreviations: IGF, insulin-like growth factor; M, male; NA, not applicable. Individuals with morphologic abnormalities induced by endocrine disruptors were chosen for microarray experiments. Morphologic lesions (not caused during capture) and maturity stages are noted.
Anomalies.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the design and application of a multispecies microarray-based test to monitor xenoestrogen exposure for environmental monitoring.
Figure 3MA plots of differential expression and signal intensity measurements using the multispecies endocrine microarray for control and exposed fish (loess normalization). (A–D) Individual LACSD-exposed fish versus pooled controls. (E–G) Individual OCSD-exposed fish versus pooled controls. (H) Pooled controls versus pooled controls. (I–K) Individual control fish versus pooled control. Each point represents data from a single 65mer oligonucleotide probe. M is a measure of differential gene expression [log2 (exposed /control)] in A–G or absence of significant differential gene expression in the self–self plots [log2 (control/control intensity)] in H–K. A is a measure of signal intensity [(0.5 log2 exposed intensity + 0.5 log2 control intensity) in A–G or (0.5 log2 control intensity + 0.5 log2 control intensity) in H–K].
Figure 4Normal q-q plots of multispecies endocrine microarray data. The q-q plots were constructed to determine whether control and exposed fish data sets derived from populations have a common distribution. (A–D) Individual LACSD-exposed fish versus pooled controls. (E–G) Individual OCSD-exposed fish versus pooled controls. (H) Pooled controls versus pooled controls. (I–K) individual control fish versus pooled control. The q-q plots show the distribution of the log2 (exposed/control) fold changes and the deviation, if any, from a normal Gaussian distribution. When the two data sets derive from a population with the same distribution, the points fall approximately along this straight line, as is the case with the control sample data populations, both pooled and individual (I–K). When the two data sets derive from populations with different distributions, the data deviate from this straight line (A–G). Exposed samples differ from the control, with a sharp rise observed in the quantile curve at log2 ratios of 2, indicating the presence of large log2 ratios and true differences in gene expression.
Figure 5Gene expression profiling of male turbot liver collected at OCSD and LACSD (contaminated) and control fish from a nonaffected area. This heat map depicts fold changes observed between exposed and control fish. LACSD and OCSD data derived from four and three independent biologic replicate microarray experiments, respectively.
Figure 6Multispecies SYBR Green qRT-PCR validation of multispecies endocrine microarray for Vtg1 (A), Vtg2( B), thyroid hormone receptor β (C), and CYP3A-specific transcripts (D) in livers from control (Con) and exposed (Exp) hornyhead turbot (each bar represents one fish). 18S rRNA served as an internal control for normalization. Plots are mean fold changes from triplicate measurements, relative to control fish. Vtg1 (A) and Vtg2 (B) transcripts were strongly up-regulated (> 15 fold) in one exposed fish. TRβ was down-regulated in two control fish. CYP3A was up-regulated in three fish and down-regulated in one fish.
Figure 7Cross-species applicability of the Multispecies endocrine microarray: detection of alterations in gene expression in zebrafish liver after a 2-week exposure to either 4-nonylphenol or estradiol. This heat map depicts fold changes between exposed and control fish. Data derived from four independent biological replicate experiments.