Steve W Cole1, Zoran Galic, Jerome A Zack. 1. Department of Medicine, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1678, USA. coles@ucla.edu
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Theoretical considerations suggest that current microarray screening algorithms may fail to detect many true differences in gene expression (Type II analytic errors). We assessed 'false negative' error rates in differential expression analyses by conventional linear statistical models (e.g. t-test), microarray-adapted variants (e.g. SAM, Cyber-T), and a novel strategy based on hold-out cross-validation. The latter approach employs the machine-learning algorithm Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) to infer minimum thresholds for reliable change in gene expression from Boolean conjunctions of fold-induction and raw fluorescence measurements. RESULTS: Monte Carlo analyses based on four empirical data sets show that conventional statistical models and their microarray-adapted variants overlook more than 50% of genes showing significant up-regulation. Conjoint PRIM prediction rules recover approximately twice as many differentially expressed transcripts while maintaining strong control over false-positive (Type I) errors. As a result, experimental replication rates increase and total analytic error rates decline. RT-PCR studies confirm that gene inductions detected by PRIM but overlooked by other methods represent true changes in mRNA levels. PRIM-based conjoint inference rules thus represent an improved strategy for high-sensitivity screening of DNA microarrays. AVAILABILITY: Freestanding JAVA application at http://microarray.crump.ucla.edu/focus
MOTIVATION: Theoretical considerations suggest that current microarray screening algorithms may fail to detect many true differences in gene expression (Type II analytic errors). We assessed 'false negative' error rates in differential expression analyses by conventional linear statistical models (e.g. t-test), microarray-adapted variants (e.g. SAM, Cyber-T), and a novel strategy based on hold-out cross-validation. The latter approach employs the machine-learning algorithm Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) to infer minimum thresholds for reliable change in gene expression from Boolean conjunctions of fold-induction and raw fluorescence measurements. RESULTS: Monte Carlo analyses based on four empirical data sets show that conventional statistical models and their microarray-adapted variants overlook more than 50% of genes showing significant up-regulation. Conjoint PRIM prediction rules recover approximately twice as many differentially expressed transcripts while maintaining strong control over false-positive (Type I) errors. As a result, experimental replication rates increase and total analytic error rates decline. RT-PCR studies confirm that gene inductions detected by PRIM but overlooked by other methods represent true changes in mRNA levels. PRIM-based conjoint inference rules thus represent an improved strategy for high-sensitivity screening of DNA microarrays. AVAILABILITY: Freestanding JAVA application at http://microarray.crump.ucla.edu/focus
Authors: Donald M Lamkin; Shreyesi Srivastava; Karen P Bradshaw; Jenna E Betz; Kevin B Muy; Anna M Wiese; Shelby K Yee; Rebecca M Waggoner; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Alexander J Yoon; Kym F Faull; Erica K Sloan; Steve W Cole Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Omer Barad; Eti Meiri; Amir Avniel; Ranit Aharonov; Adi Barzilai; Isaac Bentwich; Uri Einav; Shlomit Gilad; Patrick Hurban; Yael Karov; Edward K Lobenhofer; Eilon Sharon; Yoel M Shiboleth; Marat Shtutman; Zvi Bentwich; Paz Einat Journal: Genome Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Stephen J Glatt; Ian P Everall; William S Kremen; Jacques Corbeil; Roman Sásik; Negar Khanlou; Mark Han; Choong-Chin Liew; Ming T Tsuang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shaun D Fouse; Yin Shen; Matteo Pellegrini; Steve Cole; Alexander Meissner; Leander Van Neste; Rudolf Jaenisch; Guoping Fan Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Gregory E Miller; Edith Chen; Alexandra K Fok; Hope Walker; Alvin Lim; Erin F Nicholls; Steve Cole; Michael S Kobor Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kathleen M Scully; Dorota Skowronska-Krawczyk; Michal Krawczyk; Daria Merkurjev; Havilah Taylor; Antonia Livolsi; Jessica Tollkuhn; Radu V Stan; Michael G Rosenfeld Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: José Elias Garcia-Ortiz; Emanuele Pelosi; Shakib Omari; Timur Nedorezov; Yulan Piao; Jesse Karmazin; Manuela Uda; Antonio Cao; Steve W Cole; Antonino Forabosco; David Schlessinger; Chris Ottolenghi Journal: BMC Dev Biol Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 1.978