Literature DB >> 19269861

Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: subgroup analysis.

Shane J Nho1, Michael K Shindle, Ronald S Adler, Russell F Warren, David W Altchek, John D MacGillivray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rotator cuff registry was established to evaluate prospectively the effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study is to report the preliminary data at the 1- and 2-year time point and perform subgroup analysis to identify factors that may affect outcome.
METHODS: A total of 193 patients underwent all-arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear and met the inclusion criteria and 127 (65.8%) completed 2-year follow-up. The outcome measurements included physical examination, manual muscle testing, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The pre-operative ASES score was 52.37 +/- 24.09 and improved to 83.88 +/- 19.28 at 1 year (P < .0001) and 92.65 +/- 11.36 at 2 years (P < 0.0001). The percent healing for all patients was 64.10% at 3 months and 64.34% at 1 year (P = .4080). At 2 years, there was a significant increase in the percentage of healed tendon at 75.42% compared to the 3-month (P (1/4) .0001) and 1-year (P = 0.0332) time points. Patients with intact tendons had an ASES score of 93.9 +/- 10.2 compared to tendon defects with a score of 88.0 +/- 15.6 (P = .0623). Gender, tear size, and acromioclavicular joint involvement have a significant effect on ASES score. Rotator cuff characteristics such as tear size, biceps pathology, acromioclavicular joint pathology, and tissue quality have a significant effect on postoperative tendon integrity.
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrates significant improvement in clinical outcomes and good rate of healing by postoperative ultrasound. Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19269861     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  25 in total

1.  Functional treatment in rotator cuff tears: is it safe and effective? A retrospective comparison with surgical treatment.

Authors:  Angelo De Carli; Mattia Fabbri; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Alessandro Ciompi; Edoardo Gaj; Gioia Beccarini; Mario Vetrano; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 2.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Progression of Fatty Muscle Degeneration in Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Jonah Hebert-Davies; Sharlene A Teefey; Karen Steger-May; Aaron M Chamberlain; William Middleton; Kathryn Robinson; Ken Yamaguchi; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Technique for margin convergence in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Michael K Shindle; Shane J Nho; Denis Nam; John D Macgillivray; Frank A Cordasco; Ronald S Adler; David W Altchek; Russell F Warren
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-13

5.  Comparison of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in healthy patients over and under 65 years of age.

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Rocco Papalia; Angelo Del Buono; Vincenzo Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Richard C Mather; Lane Koenig; Daniel Acevedo; Timothy M Dall; Paul Gallo; Anthony Romeo; John Tongue; Gerald Williams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Are Psychologic Factors Associated With Shoulder Scores After Rotator Cuff Surgery?

Authors:  Alison M Thorpe; Peter B O'Sullivan; Tim Mitchell; Mark Hurworth; Jonathan Spencer; Grant Booth; Sven Goebel; Paul Khoo; Aaron Tay; Anne Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Influence of patient and diagnostic parameters on reported retear rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Andreas M Müller; Matthias Flury; Hasan N Alsayed; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Functional recovery period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: is it predictable before surgery?

Authors:  Tomoya Manaka; Yoichi Ito; Isshin Matsumoto; Kunio Takaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does the upward migration index predict function and quality of life in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Authors:  Peter C Lapner; Yingua Su; David Simon; Salah El-Fatori; Emilio Lopez-Vidriero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.