Literature DB >> 23024615

Technique for margin convergence in rotator cuff repair.

Michael K Shindle1, Shane J Nho, Denis Nam, John D Macgillivray, Frank A Cordasco, Ronald S Adler, David W Altchek, Russell F Warren.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to describe the technique of margin convergence for U-shaped rotator cuff tears and report the clinical outcomes and ultrasonography with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Three hundred eleven patients with a rotator cuff tear were prospectively enrolled in a registry at one institution. Inclusion criteria included any patient undergoing arthroscopic margin convergence for a rotator cuff tear. Exclusion criteria included open or mini-open rotator cuff repairs or suture anchor fixation to the cuff insertion without margin convergence. The outcome measurements included physical examination, manual muscle testing, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and ultrasonography. Nineteen patients met the study criteria and 13 were available for 2-year follow-up (68.4%). The mean age of this cohort was 62.2 ± 7.5 years with a mean pre-operative rotator cuff tear size of 4.0 ± 1.6 cm. The ASES score increased significantly from 50.0 ± 17.7 before surgery to 83.3 ± 19.5 at 2 years (P = 0.01). The active forward elevation also improved from 156.2 ± 11.9° before surgery to 168.0 ± 12.1 at 2 years (P = 0.03). The active external rotation 54.4 ± 14.5 at baseline and improved to 57.1 ± 19.1 at 2 years (P = 0.04). The strength also increased significantly from 6.7 ± 6.4 to 10.6 ± 4.9 lb at 1 year (P = 0.048). The post-operative ultrasound demonstrated that 46.2% of rotator cuff tears were healed at 2 years. In conclusion, margin convergence is a useful technique for U-shaped tears that are difficult to mobilize.

Entities:  

Keywords:  margin convergence; rotator cuff; shoulder arthroscopy

Year:  2011        PMID: 23024615      PMCID: PMC3192885          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-011-9222-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  19 in total

1.  American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Philip W McClure; Brian J Sennett
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation.

Authors:  Pol E Huijsmans; Mark P Pritchard; Bart M Berghs; Karin S van Rooyen; Andrew L Wallace; Joe F de Beer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff.

Authors:  D T Harryman; L A Mack; K Y Wang; S E Jackins; M L Richardson; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Rotator cuff tears: correlation of sonographic and surgical findings.

Authors:  J Hodler; C J Fretz; F Terrier; C Gerber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Sonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  L A Mack; D A Nyberg; F A Matsen
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon.

Authors:  W D Middleton; W R Reinus; W G Totty; C L Melson; W A Murphy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff.

Authors:  P T Calvert; N P Packer; D J Stoker; J I Bayley; L Kessel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-01

8.  Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. Normal and pathologic anatomy.

Authors:  C A Bretzke; J R Crass; E V Craig; S B Feinberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Prospective evaluation of the effect of rotator cuff integrity on the outcome of open rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Steven Klepps; Julie Bishop; Jason Lin; Oren Cahlon; Alyssa Strauss; Patrick Hayes; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Shane J Nho; Michael K Shindle; Ronald S Adler; Russell F Warren; David W Altchek; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of return to play in professional overhead athletes subjected to arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears and associated labral injuries using the Italian version of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score.

Authors:  G Merolla; P Paladini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-06-11

2.  Biomechanical Effect of Margin Convergence Techniques: Quantitative Assessment of Supraspinatus Muscle Stiffness.

Authors:  Taku Hatta; Hugo Giambini; Chunfeng Zhao; John W Sperling; Scott P Steinmann; Eiji Itoi; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Treatment Strategy for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Joo Han Oh; Min Suk Park; Sung Min Rhee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

4.  Arthroscopic Repair of a "U" Shaped Rotator Cuff Tear: Modified Margin Convergence with a Single Triple-loaded Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Siddharth Jain; Sitender Garg; Ravi Mittal; Vijay Kumar Digge; Ashish Shukla; Ganesh V
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-01-17

5.  Partial Rotator Cuff Repair for Massive Tears Rarely Require Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Justin D Hallock; Douglas E Parsell; Larry D Field
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.