Literature DB >> 20607465

Does the upward migration index predict function and quality of life in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Peter C Lapner1, Yingua Su, David Simon, Salah El-Fatori, Emilio Lopez-Vidriero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although upward humeral head migration is a well-recognized phenomenon in patients with tears of the cuff, it is unclear whether it relates to patient function after cuff repair. The upward migration index (UMI) assesses proximal migration of the humeral head while controlling for patients' bony morphologic features. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether functional and quality-of-life (QOL) improvement occurs longitudinally in patients with low, moderate, or high degrees of proximal humeral migration after arthroscopic cuff repair and whether differences occur between groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 118 patients with full-thickness tears treated by arthroscopic cuff repair. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the severity of preoperative proximal humeral migration seen on MRI. We determined function using two functional scores and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (a QOL index). Evaluations were performed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. A general linear model analysis controlled for patient characteristics, including the UMI, to determine their effects on functional and QOL scores.
RESULTS: Function and QOL improved after surgery in all three groups. The UMI did not correlate with final functional or QOL scores. Six-month functional and QOL scores correlated with final scores. The best predictor of final strength was initial strength.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative UMI did not correlate with functional or QOL improvements after surgery. The data suggest substantial proximal migration of the humeral head, as measured by the UMI, should not be considered a contraindication to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20607465      PMCID: PMC2947703          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1457-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  Outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Edward Lee; Julie Y Bishop; Jonathan P Braman; Joshua Langford; Jonathan Gelber; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Ten-year assessment of primary rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  G J Adamson; J E Tibone
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Nicolas Brassart; Duncan J Watkinson; Michel Carles; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Sumant G Krishnan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Subacromial space in the rheumatoid shoulder: a radiographic 15-year follow-up study of 148 shoulders.

Authors:  J T Lehtinen; E A Belt; C O Lybäck; M J Kauppi; K Kaarela; H J Kautiainen; M U Lehto
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome.

Authors:  James N Gladstone; Julie Y Bishop; Ian K Y Lo; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance.

Authors:  Nadja Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Marius R Schmid; Bernhard Jost; Clément M L Werner; Marco Zanetti
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Surgical treatment of rotator cuff rupture. Prognostic factors].

Authors:  G Walch; E Maréchal; J Maupas; J P Liotard
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1992

10.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; L Pearce McCarty; Richard W Kang; Winslow Alford; Paul B Lewis; Jennifer K Hayden
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Correlation analysis between rotator cuff tear and the superior migration of humeral head].

Authors:  Y C Zhang; J H Chen; Y Dang; M Yang; Z G Fu; D Y Zhang; P X Zhang; B G Jiang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-04-18

3.  Prognosis Driven Rehabilitation After Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery.

Authors:  Dirk Kokmeyer; Eric Dube; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-07-21

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Biologic Factors in Shoulder Disorders.

Authors:  Dimitrios Giotis; Ashkan Aryaei; Theofanis Vasilakakos; Nikolaos K Paschos
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-02-28

5.  Correlation between superior humeral head migration and proximal long head of biceps tendon pathology in patients with and without rotator cuff tears using magnetic resonance imaging and radiography.

Authors:  Josh Rattee; Laura Sims; David A Leswick; Haron Obaid
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-07-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.