| Literature DB >> 19267935 |
Richard K Le Leu1, Ying Hu, Ian L Brown, Graeme P Young.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated in rats the effects of feeding different forms of high amylose maize starches (HAMS) rich in resistant starch (RS) to understand what the implications of RS heterogeneity might be for colonic biology, including innate cellular responses to DNA-damage.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19267935 PMCID: PMC2656505 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-6-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Treatment procedure, dietary fibre and resistant starch levels of the different RS forms1,2
| Treatment | none | hydrothermal | hydrothermal | hydrothermal | retrogradation |
| RS type | RS2 | RS2 | RS2 | RS2 | RS3 |
| RS amount (%)1 | 48 | 50 | 53 | 46 | 47 |
| Total Dietary Fibre (%)2 | 18 | 62 | 40 | 60 | 36 |
1 The RS values were determined on a dry weight basis for the different HAMS by AOAC 2002.02 method.
2 The total dietary fibre (TDF) were determined on a dry weight basis for the different amylose maize starches by AOAC Method 991.43.
Composition of experimental diets (g/100 g diet)1
| Casein | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
| Corn starch | 46.15 | 41.15 | 26.15 | 26.15 | 26.15 | 26.15 | 26.15 |
| α-cellulose | - | 5.00 | - | - | - | - | - |
| HYLON VII | - | - | 20.00 | - | - | - | - |
| Hi-maize 1043 | - | - | - | 20.00 | - | - | - |
| Hi-maize 240 | - | - | - | - | 20.00 | - | - |
| Hi-maize 260 | - | - | - | - | - | 20.00 | - |
| NOVELOSE 330 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20.00 |
| Corn oil | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 |
| Sucrose | 10.95 | 10.95 | 10.95 | 10.95 | 10.95 | 10.95 | 10.95 |
| dl-Methionine | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Choline | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Mineral mix1 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
1 AIN-76 vitamin and mineral mixtures [17]
Effect of experimental diets on final bodyweight, food intake, faecal output, pH, caecal weight and caecal content weight1.
| Final bodyweight | 369 ± 4 | 353 ± 8 | 345 ± 10 | 345 ± 11 | 341 ± 9 | 366 ± 8 | 359 ± 4 |
| Food intake (g/d) | 17.9 ± 0.8bc | 18.0 ± 0.5bc | 15.5 ± 0.7a | 15.8 ± 0.7ab | 15.4 ± 0.7a | 15.6 ± 0.5ab | 19.0 ± 0.4c |
| Faecal Output (g/d) | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 1.7 ± 0.1b | 1.7 ± 0.2b | 1.9 ± 0.2b | 1.7 ± 0.2b | 2.2 ± 0.2b | 3.2 ± 0.3c |
| Faecal pH | 7.4 ± 0.05d | 7.1 ± 0.03c | 5.7 ± 0.03ab | 5.8 ± 0.05b | 5.7 ± 0.04ab | 5.8 ± 0.07b | 5.5 ± 0.03a |
| Caecal pH | 7.5 ± 0.06c | 7.2 ± 0.05b | 5.6 ± 0.03a | 5.6 ± 0.02a | 5.7 ± 0.02a | 5.7 ± 0.01a | 5.5 ± 0.03a |
| Caecum weight (g) | 0.60 ± 0.03ab | 0.54 ± 0.02a | 0.66 ± 0.03b | 0.62 ± 0.04ab | 0.66 ± 0.03ab | 0.71 ± 0.04b | 0.95 ± 0.04c |
| Caecal contents (g) | 1.3 ± 0.05a | 1.58 ± 0.08ab | 1.50 ± 0.11ab | 1.24 ± 0.05a | 1.97 ± 0.06b | 1.76 ± 0.09b | 2.43 ± 0.19c |
1 Means ± SEM, n = 12. Means with superscripts without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
Effect of experimental diets on SCFA concentrations in caecum and faeces1
| Total SCFA | 44.7 ± 3.5a | 40.0 ± 3.1a | 62.8 ± 6.9ab | 78.9 ± 9.4b | 54.8 ± 5.8ab | 71.0 ± 8.7b | 56.5 ± 7.3ab |
| Acetate | 28.9 ± 2.5 | 26.2 ± 2.3 | 36.6 ± 4.7 | 41.4 ± 5.3 | 33.5 ± 4.3 | 31.4 ± 4.7 | 40.2 ± 5.7 |
| Propionate | 10.7 ± 0.8a | 8.1 ± 0.8a | 9.5 ± 1.7a | 22.3 ± 2.9c | 12.9 ± 1.2ab | 16.8 ± 2.2bc | 10.2 ± 1.1a |
| Butyrate | 5.1 ± 0.4a | 4.4 ± 0.80a | 15.1 ± 3.1bc | 12.3 ± 1.7b | 6.5 ± 1.1a | 20.3 ± 3.0c | 4.4 ± 0.8a |
| Total SCFA | 25.1 ± 3.1ab | 19.5 ± 2.0a | 40.5 ± 4.1bc | 48.2 ± 5.4c | 44.2 ± 7.9c | 37.9 ± 2.9bc | 35.2 ± 4.0abc |
| Acetate | 17.3 ± 2.0ab | 14.4 ± 1.4a | 24.0 ± 2.7bc | 28.6 ± 3.6c | 25.7 ± 2.2bc | 19.5 ± 2.2abc | 25.3 ± 3.2bc |
| Propionate | 5.0 ± 0.9a | 3.7 ± 0.4a | 4.0 ± 0.8a | 11.1 ± 1.4b | 4.9 ± 0.6a | 5.9 ± 0.5a | 5.9 ± 1.0a |
| Butyrate | 2.7 ± 0.4a | 1.8 ± 0.2a | 11.5 ± 4.0b | 6.5 ± 0.9ab | 3.8 ± 1.3a | 11.0 ± 2.6b | 2.5 ± 0.5a |
1 Means ± SEM, n = 12. Means with superscripts without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
Figure 1Effect of experimental diets on colonic epithelial events. Effect of experimental diets on colonic crypt column height (A), colonic epithelial cell turnover (B), colonic positive Ki-67 cells (C) and AOM-induced apoptosis (D). Means ± SEM, n = 12. Means with superscripts without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.
Correlations between apoptotic index, cell turnover, Ki-67 counts and crypt height in distal colon and selected caecal and faecal parameters1
| Total SCFA (μmol/g) | 0.130 | 0.19 | -0.376 | 0.005 | -0.306 | 0.02 | -.114 | 0.26 |
| Acetate | 0.014 | 0.89 | -0.314 | 0.02 | -0.23 | 0.09 | -0.09 | 0.37 |
| Propionate | 0.071 | 0.48 | -0.196 | 0.15 | -0.16 | 0.26 | -0.16 | 0.10 |
| Butyrate | 0.280 | 0.004 | -0.325 | 0.02 | -0.3 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.46 |
| pH | -0.191 | 0.052 | 0.635 | 0.001 | 0.57 | 0.001 | -0.08 | 0.44 |
| Total SCFA | 0.06 | 0.56 | -0.104 | 0.45 | -0.19 | 0.18 | -0.13 | 0.21 |
| Acetate | -0.039 | 0.69 | -0.253 | 0.06 | -0.27 | 0.05 | -0.1 | 0.34 |
| Propionate | 0.018 | 0.86 | -0.065 | 0.64 | -0.06 | 0.64 | -0.17 | 0.10 |
| Butyrate | 0.265 | 0.008 | -0.257 | 0.06 | -0.25 | 0.06 | -0.12 | 0.25 |
| pH | -0.164 | 0.099 | 0.610 | 0.001 | 0.54 | 0.001 | -0.08 | 0.41 |
1 Relationship between caecal, colonic and faecal variables with apoptosis and epithelial kinetics were analysed by Spearman's correlation test.