Brian M Hoffman1, Dennis R Dean, Lance C Seefeldt. 1. Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Tech K148, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA. bmh@northwestern.edu
Abstract
"Nitrogen fixation", the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) to two ammonia (NH3) molecules, by the Mo-dependent nitrogenase is essential for all life. Despite four decades of research, a daunting number of unanswered questions about the mechanism of nitrogenase activity make it the "Everest of enzymes". This Account describes our efforts to climb one "face" of this mountain by meeting two interdependent challenges central to determining the mechanism of biological N2 reduction. The first challenge is to determine the reaction pathway: the composition and structure of each of the substrate-derived moieties bound to the catalytic FeMo cofactor (FeMo-co) of the molybdenum-iron (MoFe) protein of nitrogenase. To overcome this challenge, it is necessary to discriminate between the two classes of potential reaction pathways: (1) a "distal" (D) pathway, in which H atoms add sequentially at a single N or (2) an "alternating" (A) pathway, in which H atoms add alternately to the two N atoms of N2. Second, it is necessary to characterize the dynamics of conversion among intermediates within the accepted Lowe-Thorneley kinetic scheme for N2 reduction. That goal requires an experimental determination of the number of electrons and protons delivered to the MoFe protein as well as their "inventory", a partition into those residing on each of the reaction components and released as H2 or NH3. The principal obstacle to this "climb" has been the inability to generate N2 reduction intermediates for characterization. A combination of genetic, biochemical, and spectroscopic approaches recently overcame this obstacle. These experiments identified one of the four-iron Fe-S faces of the active-site FeMo-co as the specific site of reactivity, indicated that the side chain of residue alpha70V controls access to this face, and supported the involvement of the side chain of residue alpha195H in proton delivery. We can now freeze-quench trap N2 reduction pathway intermediates and use electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) and electron spin-echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopies to characterize them. However, even successful trapping of a N2 reduction intermediate occurs without synchronous electron delivery to the MoFe protein. As a result, the number of electrons and protons, n, delivered to MoFe during its formation is unknown. To determine n and the electron inventory, we initially employed ENDOR spectroscopy to analyze the substrate moiety bound to the FeMo-co and 57Fe within the cofactor. Difficulties in using that approach led us to devise a robust kinetic protocol for determining n of a trapped intermediate. This Account describes strategies that we have formulated to bring this "face" of the nitrogenase mechanism into view and afford approaches to its climb. Although the summit remains distant, we look forward to continued progress in the ascent.
"nclass="Chemical">Nitrogen fixation", the reduction of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">dinitrogen (N2) to two ammonia (NH3) molecules, by the Mo-dependent nitrogenase is essential for all life. Despite four decades of research, a daunting number of unanswered questions about the mechanism of nitrogenase activity make it the "Everest of enzymes". This Account describes our efforts to climb one "face" of this mountain by meeting two interdependent challenges central to determining the mechanism of biological N2 reduction. The first challenge is to determine the reaction pathway: the composition and structure of each of the substrate-derived moieties bound to the catalytic FeMo cofactor (FeMo-co) of the molybdenum-iron (MoFe) protein of nitrogenase. To overcome this challenge, it is necessary to discriminate between the two classes of potential reaction pathways: (1) a "distal" (D) pathway, in which H atoms add sequentially at a single N or (2) an "alternating" (A) pathway, in which H atoms add alternately to the two N atoms of N2. Second, it is necessary to characterize the dynamics of conversion among intermediates within the accepted Lowe-Thorneley kinetic scheme for N2 reduction. That goal requires an experimental determination of the number of electrons and protons delivered to the MoFe protein as well as their "inventory", a partition into those residing on each of the reaction components and released as H2 or NH3. The principal obstacle to this "climb" has been the inability to generate N2 reduction intermediates for characterization. A combination of genetic, biochemical, and spectroscopic approaches recently overcame this obstacle. These experiments identified one of the four-ironFe-S faces of the active-site FeMo-co as the specific site of reactivity, indicated that the side chain of residue alpha70V controls access to this face, and supported the involvement of the side chain of residue alpha195H in proton delivery. We can now freeze-quench trap N2 reduction pathway intermediates and use electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) and electron spin-echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopies to characterize them. However, even successful trapping of a N2 reduction intermediate occurs without synchronous electron delivery to the MoFe protein. As a result, the number of electrons and protons, n, delivered to MoFe during its formation is unknown. To determine n and the electron inventory, we initially employed ENDOR spectroscopy to analyze the substrate moiety bound to the FeMo-co and 57Fe within the cofactor. Difficulties in using that approach led us to devise a robust kinetic protocol for determining n of a trapped intermediate. This Account describes strategies that we have formulated to bring this "face" of the nitrogenase mechanism into view and afford approaches to its climb. Although the summit remains distant, we look forward to continued progress in the ascent.
Authors: Oliver Einsle; F Akif Tezcan; Susana L A Andrade; Benedikt Schmid; Mika Yoshida; James B Howard; Douglas C Rees Journal: Science Date: 2002-09-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dmitriy Lukoyanov; Brett M Barney; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt; Brian M Hoffman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hong-In Lee; Morten Sørlie; Jason Christiansen; Tran-Chin Yang; Junlong Shao; Dennis R Dean; Brian J Hales; Brian M Hoffman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Brett M Barney; Mikhail Laryukhin; Robert Y Igarashi; Hong-In Lee; Patricia C Dos Santos; Tran-Chin Yang; Brian M Hoffman; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2005-06-07 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Dmitriy Lukoyanov; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Nathan Maeser; Mikhail Laryukhin; Tran Chin Yang; Louis Noodleman; Dennis R Dean; David A Case; Lance C Seefeldt; Brian M Hoffman Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Aaron M Appel; John E Bercaw; Andrew B Bocarsly; Holger Dobbek; Daniel L DuBois; Michel Dupuis; James G Ferry; Etsuko Fujita; Russ Hille; Paul J A Kenis; Cheryl A Kerfeld; Robert H Morris; Charles H F Peden; Archie R Portis; Stephen W Ragsdale; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Joost N H Reek; Lance C Seefeldt; Rudolf K Thauer; Grover L Waldrop Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: John S Anderson; George E Cutsail; Jonathan Rittle; Bridget A Connor; William A Gunderson; Limei Zhang; Brian M Hoffman; Jonas C Peters Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Leland B Gee; Igor Leontyev; Alexei Stuchebrukhov; Aubrey D Scott; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Stephen P Cramer Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 3.162