Literature DB >> 19265858

Inappropriate treatment of prostate cancer caused by heterophilic antibody interference.

Nicolas Henry1, Phillipe Sebe, Olivier Cussenot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 58-year-old man, without any personal or familial risk factors for prostate cancer, visited his primary care physician for a first routine prostate cancer screening with a serum PSA test. INVESTIGATIONS: Serum PSA test, digital rectal examination, prostate biopsy and pathological analysis, repeat serum PSA tests and pathological re-evaluation, abdominal tomodensitometry, whole-body bone scan and prostatic MRI. DIAGNOSIS: Highly elevated serum PSA indicative of advanced prostate cancer at high risk for metastasis. MANAGEMENT: The patient was started on androgen deprivation therapy with goserelin acetate and bicalutamide. At 3 months, he was asymptomatic, his prostate was atrophic on digital rectal examination and he had suppressed serum testosterone. However, his serum PSA level remained highly elevated in the absence of any radiographic evidence of advanced cancer. A repeat PSA test using a different assay returned a negligible PSA concentration; evaluation with blocker agents revealed the presence of heterophilic antibody interference with the original PSA assay. The patient was rediagnosed as having a likely low-grade prostate adenocarcinoma; androgen deprivation therapy was stopped, and he was deemed a candidate for watchful waiting. At 15 months, his serum PSA level remained stable at a low level, and prostatic dynamic MRI showed no sign of tumor in the prostate or in the pelvis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19265858     DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro1317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol        ISSN: 1743-4270


  15 in total

1.  Falsely increased prostate-specific antigen concentration attributed to heterophilic antibodies.

Authors:  Tomás Camacho; Josefina Mora; Ana Segura; Javier Guitián; Fernando Lema; Jesús Bandín; José Rodríguez-Espinosa
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 2.  Endogenous interference in immunoassays in clinical chemistry. A review.

Authors:  T H Weber; K I Käpyaho; P Tanner
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl       Date:  1990

3.  False diagnosis and needless therapy of presumed malignant disease in women with false-positive human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations.

Authors:  S Rotmensch; L A Cole
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A radical approach is needed to eliminate interference from endogenous antibodies in immunoassays.

Authors:  Adel A A Ismail
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; Timothy A Masterson; Kinjal C Vora; Scott E Eggener; James A Eastham; Bertrand D Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Heterophilic antibodies remain a problem for the immunoassay laboratory.

Authors:  G Ward; L McKinnon; T Badrick; P E Hickman
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Circulating antibodies to ovine and bovine immunoglobulin in healthy subjects: a hazard for immunoassays.

Authors:  W M Hunter; P S Budd
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium.

Authors:  A W Partin; L A Mangold; D M Lamm; P C Walsh; J I Epstein; J D Pearson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen associated with metastatic prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  A A Safa; D M Reese; D M Carter; J Phillipson; R Smith; S Dougherty
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in clinical practice: quality requirements.

Authors:  Catharine M Sturgeon; Barry R Hoffman; Daniel W Chan; Soo-Ling Ch'ng; Elizabeth Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Lance A Liotta; Emmanuel F Petricoin; Manfred Schmitt; O John Semmes; Györg Söletormos; Elena van der Merwe; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  3 in total

1.  Repeated spurious elevation of serum prostate-specific antigen values solved by chemiluminescence analysis: A possible interference by heterophilic antibodies.

Authors:  Arturo Domínguez; Miquel Bayó; Jesús Muñoz-Rodríguez; Jose Antonio Bellido; Jose María Abascal-Junquera; Naim Hannaoui; Josep Maria Banús
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 2.  Falsely Undetectable Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Due to Presence of an Inhibitory Serum Factor: A Case Report and Review of Pertinent Literature.

Authors:  Nicholas B Loudas; Anthony A Killeen; Vikram Palamalai; Christopher J Weight; Arpit Rao; L Chinsoo Cho
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-24

3.  DNA-linked Inhibitor Antibody Assay (DIANA) for sensitive and selective enzyme detection and inhibitor screening.

Authors:  Václav Navrátil; Jiří Schimer; Jan Tykvart; Tomáš Knedlík; Viktor Vik; Pavel Majer; Jan Konvalinka; Pavel Šácha
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.