Lara Traeger1, Sheila Cannon, Nancy L Keating, William F Pirl, Christopher Lathan, Michelle Y Martin, Yulei He, Elyse R Park. 1. Lara Traeger, William F. Pirl, and Elyse R. Park, Massachusetts General Hospital; Lara Traeger, Nancy L. Keating, William F. Pirl, Yulei He, and Elyse R. Park, Harvard Medical School; Sheila Cannon, University of Massachusetts Boston; Nancy L. Keating, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Lathan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; and Michelle Y. Martin, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined race by sex differences in depression symptoms and psychosocial service use (pastors, social workers, mental health workers, support groups) among patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The multiregional Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance study surveyed black and white adults with stages I to III lung cancer (n = 1,043) about depression symptoms, interest in help for mood, and psychosocial service use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate race/sex differences in depression symptoms (modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥ 6) and psychosocial service use, independent of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral covariates. RESULTS: A total of 18.2% screened positive for depression symptoms. This proportion was highest among black men (24.7%), followed by white women (20.6%), black women (15.8%), and white men (15.0%). In adjusted analyses, white women showed greater risk for depression symptoms relative to black women (P = .01) and white men (P = .002), with no other differences among groups. Black patients were less likely than white patients to receive desired help for mood from their doctors (P = .02), regardless of sex. Among all patients, black women were most likely to have contact with pastoral care and social work. CONCLUSION: Race and sex interacted to predict risk of depression symptoms. Covariates accounted for elevated risk among black men. White women showed greater risk than black women and white men, independent of covariates. Black patients may experience greater barriers to receiving help for mood from their doctors. Race by sex differences in contact with psychosocial services highlight potential differences in the extent to which services are available, acceptable, and/or sought by patients.
PURPOSE: This study examined race by sex differences in depression symptoms and psychosocial service use (pastors, social workers, mental health workers, support groups) among patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The multiregional Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance study surveyed black and white adults with stages I to III lung cancer (n = 1,043) about depression symptoms, interest in help for mood, and psychosocial service use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate race/sex differences in depression symptoms (modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥ 6) and psychosocial service use, independent of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral covariates. RESULTS: A total of 18.2% screened positive for depression symptoms. This proportion was highest among black men (24.7%), followed by white women (20.6%), black women (15.8%), and white men (15.0%). In adjusted analyses, white women showed greater risk for depression symptoms relative to black women (P = .01) and white men (P = .002), with no other differences among groups. Black patients were less likely than white patients to receive desired help for mood from their doctors (P = .02), regardless of sex. Among all patients, black women were most likely to have contact with pastoral care and social work. CONCLUSION: Race and sex interacted to predict risk of depression symptoms. Covariates accounted for elevated risk among black men. White women showed greater risk than black women and white men, independent of covariates. Black patients may experience greater barriers to receiving help for mood from their doctors. Race by sex differences in contact with psychosocial services highlight potential differences in the extent to which services are available, acceptable, and/or sought by patients.
Authors: David R Williams; Hector M González; Harold Neighbors; Randolph Nesse; Jamie M Abelson; Julie Sweetman; James S Jackson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-03
Authors: Lisa R Shugarman; Katherine Mack; Melony E S Sorbero; Haijun Tian; Arvind K Jain; J Scott Ashwood; Steven M Asch Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Richard G Wight; Carol S Aneshensel; Christopher Barrett; Michelle Ko; Joshua Chodosh; Arun S Karlamangla Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Benjamin P Chapman; Michael Hoerger; Fahad Saeed; Elizabeth Guancial; Jennifer W Mack Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-07-10
Authors: Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ira L Leeds; Patrick M Meyers; Zachary O Enumah; Jin He; Richard A Burkhart; Elliott R Haut; Jonathan E Efron; Fabian M Johnston Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Heidy N Medina; Patricia I Moreno; Vandana Sookdeo; Akina Natori; Cody Boland; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Carmen Calfa; Jessica MacIntyre; Tracy E Crane; Sofia F Garcia Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2022-03-15
Authors: Anish J Mehta; Shannon Stock; Stacy W Gray; David R Nerenz; John Z Ayanian; Nancy L Keating Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Albert Yeung; Lauren E Slipp; Halsey Niles; Jolene Jacquart; Choi-Ling Chow; Maurizio Fava; John W Denninger; Herbert Benson; Gregory L Fricchione Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 3.390