Literature DB >> 19263147

Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases.

Jyewon Song1, Wook Ho Kang, Sung Jin Oh, Woo Jin Hyung, Seung Ho Choi, Sung Hoon Noh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery was invented to overcome the demerits of laparoscopic surgery. However, the role of robotic surgery in gastrectomy has rarely been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the use of robot-assisted distal subtotal gastrectomy to facilitate surgical training for gastric cancer.
METHODS: Twenty gastric cancer patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy from July 2005 to November 2006 were compared with 20 initial patients who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy from May 2003 to August 2003 and 20 recent patients who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy during the same period as the 20 robotic gastrectomy procedures by the same surgeon. RESULT: All 60 patients underwent subtotal gastrectomies with gastroduodenostomy without open or laparoscopic conversion. Operation time for robotic gastrectomy, initial laparoscopic gastrectomy, and recent laparoscopic gastrectomy was 230 min (range 171-312 min), 289.5 min (range 190-450 min), and 134.1 min (range 90-260 min). The number of retrieved lymph nodes was 35.3 +/- 10.5, 31.5 +/- 17.1, and 42.7 +/- 14.9, respectively. Hospital stay was 5.7, 7.7, and 6.2 days, respectively. Postoperative complication occurred in two patients in recent laparoscopic gastrectomy and one patient each in robotic and initial laparoscopic gastrectomy.
CONCLUSION: In this context, it could be assumed that experienced laparoscopic surgeons could perform robotic gastrectomy with a certain level of skill, even in initial series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263147     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair using a robotic-controlled atrial retractor.

Authors:  J Michael Smith; Hubert Stein; Amy M Engel; Sarah McDonough; Lindsey Lonneman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Robotic-assisted closure of atrial septal defect under real-time three-dimensional echo guide: in vitro study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Suematsu; Bob Kiaii; Daniel T Bainbridge; Pedro J del Nido; Richard J Novick
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Ichiro Uyama; Kenichi Sugihara; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition -

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta : the early learning curve.

Authors:  J Diks; D Nio; V Jongkind; M A Cuesta; J A Rauwerda; W Wisselink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  J Bodner; H Wykypiel; G Wetscher; T Schmid
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Marcelo A Orvieto; Edward M Gong; Albert A Mikhail; Ofer N Gofrit; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.

Authors:  Dan S Veljovich; Pamela J Paley; Charles W Drescher; Elise N Everett; Chirag Shah; William A Peters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  62 in total

1.  Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong Man Yoon; Young-Woo Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Bang Wool Eom; Ji Yeon Park; Il Ju Choi; Chan Gyoo Kim; Jong Yeul Lee; Soo Jeong Cho; Ji Yoon Rho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuiciro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Livia Procopiuc; Ştefan Tudor; Mircea Mănuc; Mircea Diculescu; Cătălin Vasilescu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15

4.  Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Minah Cho; Chul Kyu Roh; Won Jun Seo; Seohee Choi; Taeil Son; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Oncological, Cost, and Surgical Stress Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Ying Kong; Shougen Cao; Xiaodong Liu; Zequn Li; Liankai Wang; Cunlong Lu; Shuai Shen; Houxin Zhu; Yanbing Zhou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Ikeda; Masako Urata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ernst Hanisch; Dimosthenis Ziogas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Byung Hee Kang; Yi Xuan; Hoon Hur; Chang Wook Ahn; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a technical review.

Authors:  Woo Jin Hyung; Yanghee Woo; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.