Peter J Embi1, Philip R O Payne. 1. Center for Health Informatics, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, 231 Albert Sabin Way, PO Box 670840, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0840, USA. peter.embi@uc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Clinical Research Informatics, an emerging sub-domain of Biomedical Informatics, is currently not well defined. A formal description of CRI including major challenges and opportunities is needed to direct progress in the field. DESIGN: Given the early stage of CRI knowledge and activity, we engaged in a series of qualitative studies with key stakeholders and opinion leaders to determine the range of challenges and opportunities facing CRI. These phases employed complimentary methods to triangulate upon our findings. MEASUREMENTS: Study phases included: 1) a group interview with key stakeholders, 2) an email follow-up survey with a larger group of self-identified CRI professionals, and 3) validation of our results via electronic peer-debriefing and member-checking with a group of CRI-related opinion leaders. Data were collected, transcribed, and organized for formal, independent content analyses by experienced qualitative investigators, followed by an iterative process to identify emergent categorizations and thematic descriptions of the data. RESULTS: We identified a range of challenges and opportunities facing the CRI domain. These included 13 distinct themes spanning academic, practical, and organizational aspects of CRI. These findings also informed the development of a formal definition of CRI and supported further representations that illustrate areas of emphasis critical to advancing the domain. CONCLUSIONS: CRI has emerged as a distinct discipline that faces multiple challenges and opportunities. The findings presented summarize those challenges and opportunities and provide a framework that should help inform next steps to advance this important new discipline.
OBJECTIVES: Clinical Research Informatics, an emerging sub-domain of Biomedical Informatics, is currently not well defined. A formal description of CRI including major challenges and opportunities is needed to direct progress in the field. DESIGN: Given the early stage of CRI knowledge and activity, we engaged in a series of qualitative studies with key stakeholders and opinion leaders to determine the range of challenges and opportunities facing CRI. These phases employed complimentary methods to triangulate upon our findings. MEASUREMENTS: Study phases included: 1) a group interview with key stakeholders, 2) an email follow-up survey with a larger group of self-identified CRI professionals, and 3) validation of our results via electronic peer-debriefing and member-checking with a group of CRI-related opinion leaders. Data were collected, transcribed, and organized for formal, independent content analyses by experienced qualitative investigators, followed by an iterative process to identify emergent categorizations and thematic descriptions of the data. RESULTS: We identified a range of challenges and opportunities facing the CRI domain. These included 13 distinct themes spanning academic, practical, and organizational aspects of CRI. These findings also informed the development of a formal definition of CRI and supported further representations that illustrate areas of emphasis critical to advancing the domain. CONCLUSIONS: CRI has emerged as a distinct discipline that faces multiple challenges and opportunities. The findings presented summarize those challenges and opportunities and provide a framework that should help inform next steps to advance this important new discipline.
Authors: Scott Oster; Stephen Langella; Shannon Hastings; David Ervin; Ravi Madduri; Joshua Phillips; Tahsin Kurc; Frank Siebenlist; Peter Covitz; Krishnakant Shanbhag; Ian Foster; Joel Saltz Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Philip R O Payne; Tara B Borlawsky; Omkar Lele; Stephen James; Andrew W Greaves Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Casimir A Kulikowski; Edward H Shortliffe; Leanne M Currie; Peter L Elkin; Lawrence E Hunter; Todd R Johnson; Ira J Kalet; Leslie A Lenert; Mark A Musen; Judy G Ozbolt; Jack W Smith; Peter Z Tarczy-Hornoch; Jeffrey J Williamson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Shawn N Murphy; Anil Dubey; Peter J Embi; Paul A Harris; Brent G Richter; Fran Turisco; Griffin M Weber; James E Tcheng; Diane Keogh Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Jie Xu; Luke V Rasmussen; Pamela L Shaw; Guoqian Jiang; Richard C Kiefer; Huan Mo; Jennifer A Pacheco; Peter Speltz; Qian Zhu; Joshua C Denny; Jyotishman Pathak; William K Thompson; Enid Montague Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joseph P Kitzmiller; Peter J Embi; Kandamurugu Manickam; Kevin M Sweet; Mitch A Phelps; Rebecca D Jackson; Clay B Marsh; Wolfgang Sadee Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.533