Literature DB >> 19261297

Surgical resident performance on a virtual reality simulator correlates with operating room performance.

Eyad M Wohaibi1, Ronald W Bush, David B Earle, Neal E Seymour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To define the ability of a virtual reality (VR) simulator to reflect clinical skill in surgical residents, we compared clinical laparoscopic performance and contemporary lab performance during curricular VR skills training.
METHODS: Nine postgraduate year (PGY) 1 and 2 surgical residents were assessed during laparoscopic cholecystectomies and appendectomies using a web-based interactive database (OpRate)over a 6-mo period. Operative performance data were collected at the conclusion of procedures (mean responses of attending surgeons in nine areas pertaining to resident preparedness and technical skill). During this period, all residents undertook iterative laparoscopic training using a new VR trainer (SEP: SimSurgery AS, Oslo, Norway; METI, Sarasota FL). OpRate performance over 4-wk blocks and closest VR performance data (mean time, path length, and errors for three iterations of six basic skills tasks) were tested for correlation by linear (Pearson) correlation method.
RESULTS: Residents performed 1 to 6 operative cases each (median = 3) during time blocks used for comparisons (median separation operative and SEP performance data 18 d). Significant correlation of operative and VR scores was found for time to task completion in 5 of 6 VR tasks. Results were most significant for a gallbladder dissection task (P = 0.0066, correlation coefficient = -0.6671). No significant correlation of path length or error data and operative performance was observed for any VR task.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that time to task completion on a VR training device correlates with resident performance in the clinical operating room. Serial evaluations will determine if concurrent performance improvement over time can be demonstrated. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19261297     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  10 in total

1.  Virtual reality laparoscopy: which potential trainee starts with a higher proficiency level?

Authors:  M Paschold; M Schröder; D W Kauff; T Gorbauch; M Herzer; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Characteristics predicting laparoscopic skill in medical students: nine years' experience in a single center.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nomura; Takeshi Matsutani; Nobutoshi Hagiwara; Itsuo Fujita; Yoshiharu Nakamura; Yoshikazu Kanazawa; Hiroshi Makino; Yasuhiro Mamada; Terumichi Fujikura; Masao Miyashita; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot.

Authors:  Roger Smith; Mireille Truong; Manuela Perez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Defining the Relationship Between Compressive Stress and Tissue Trauma During Laparoscopic Surgery Using Human Large Intestine.

Authors:  Amanda Farah Khan; Matthew Kenneth Macdonald; Catherine Streutker; Corwyn Rowsell; James Drake; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.316

7.  Use of collapsible box trainer as a module for resident education.

Authors:  Angel M Caban; Christopher Guido; Michele Silver; George Rossidis; George Sarosi; Kfir Ben-David
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  How valid are commercially available medical simulators?

Authors:  Jj Stunt; Ph Wulms; Gm Kerkhoffs; J Dankelman; Cn van Dijk; Gjm Tuijthof
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-10-14

9.  Endourological simulator performance in female but not male medical students predicts written examination results in basic surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Schlickum; Li Felländer-Tsai; Leif Hedman; Lars Henningsohn
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 1.612

10.  Structuralized box-trainer laparoscopic training significantly improves performance in complex virtual reality laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Dariusz Laski; Tomasz J Stefaniak; Wojciech Makarewicz; Monika Proczko; Zbigniew Gruca; Zbigniew Sledziński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.195

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.