Literature DB >> 19259784

Limiting radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography: much can be achieved with little extra effort.

Stephan Achenbach.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19259784     DOI： 10.1007/s10554-009-9448-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN： 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.

Authors:  Takao Maruyama; Masanori Takada; Toshiaki Hasuike; Atsushi Yoshikawa; Eiji Namimatsu; Tohru Yoshizumi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications.

Authors:  L W Johnson; E C Lozner; S Johnson; R Krone; A D Pichard; G W Vetrovec; T J Noto
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1989-05

4.  Risk of cardiac catheterization in patients aged > or = 80 years without previous cardiac surgery.

Authors:  V L Clark; F Khaja
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Matthijs F L Meijs; Joanne D Schuijf; Maarten J Cramer; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Koen Nieman; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Annick C Weustink; Alexander M de Vos; Francesca Pugliese; Benno Rensing; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax; Mathias Prokop; Pieter A Doevendans; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Hirai; Jun Horiguchi; Chikako Fujioka; Masao Kiguchi; Hideya Yamamoto; Noriaki Matsuura; Toshiro Kitagawa; Hiroki Teragawa; Nobuoki Kohno; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance.

Authors:  H Scheffel; H Alkadhi; S Leschka; A Plass; L Desbiolles; I Guber; T Krauss; J Gruenenfelder; M Genoni; T F Luescher; B Marincek; P Stolzmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.

Authors:  William P Shuman; Kelley R Branch; Janet M May; Lee M Mitsumori; David W Lockhart; Theodore J Dubinsky; Bill H Warren; James H Caldwell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Franziska Hermann; Martin Hadamitzky; Markus Krebs; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia McCollough; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 56.272
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.