Literature DB >> 19259747

Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery.

Catherine R McMillan1, Paul A Binhammer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, or tumor. Eighty-one subjects prospectively completed each questionnaire shortly before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests. Responsiveness to clinical change was calculated using standardized response means. The DASH was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.77), wrist pain (0.61), and tumor (0.55); the MHQ was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (1.04), wrist pain (0.87), and finger contracture (0.62); and the PSFS was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.65) and finger contracture (0.64). The interval during which the highest responsiveness occurred for the carpal tunnel, wrist pain, and finger contracture groups was the preoperative to 6-month period. The tumor group experienced the highest responsiveness during the preoperative to 3-month period. Our results indicate that one or more of the instruments evaluated are suitable for outcomes research related to surgery to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, and tumor.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19259747      PMCID: PMC2724618          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-009-9167-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  34 in total

1.  Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment.

Authors:  Sandra V Kotsis; Frank H Lau; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Postoperative hand therapy in Dupuytren's disease.

Authors:  Hester Herweijer; Pieter U Dijkstra; Jean-Philippe A Nicolai; Corry K Van der Sluis
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction.

Authors:  M D Westaway; P W Stratford; J M Binkley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 4.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores.

Authors:  P W Stratford; J M Binkley; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1996-10

5.  The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change.

Authors:  K C Chung; J B Hamill; M R Walters; R A Hayward
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash.

Authors:  Mark Stewart; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge; Nikolai Bogduk; Michael Nicholas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Manual physical therapy examination and intervention of a patient with radial wrist pain: a case report.

Authors:  Michael J Walker
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?

Authors:  J R Greenslade; R L Mehta; P Belward; D J Warwick
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

Review 9.  Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose?

Authors:  Manish Changulani; Ugochuku Okonkwo; Tulsi Keswani; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The effectiveness of ENAR for the treatment of chronic neck pain in Australian adults: a preliminary single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew L Vitiello; Rodney Bonello; Henry Pollard
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2007-07-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Validity and interpretability of the QuickDASH in the assessment of hand disability in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marco Di Carlo; Marina Carotti; Sonia Farah
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Prevalence of cold sensitivity in patients with hand pathology.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Steven J McCabe
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Vascularized Bone Grafting in Scaphoid Nonunion: A Review of Patient-Centered Outcomes.

Authors:  Ram K Alluri; Christine Yin; Matthew L Iorio; Hyuma Leland; Jason Wong; Ketan Patel
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-07-07

4.  Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jennifer F Waljee; H Myra Kim; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The effect of informed consent on results of a standard upper extremity intake questionnaire.

Authors:  Taylor Buckley; David Mitten; John Elfar
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Evaluation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in hand fractures and dislocations.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Marianne M Williams; Kathleen Conaty
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

7.  Validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients following upper extremity nerve injury.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Dimitri J Anastakis; Dorcas E Beaton; Susan E Mackinnon; Joel Katz
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-06

8.  The impact of depression and pain catastrophization on initial presentation and treatment outcomes for atraumatic hand conditions.

Authors:  Daniel A London; Jeffrey G Stepan; Martin I Boyer; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  How to use outcomes questionnaires: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Translation, cross-cultural and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS® upper extremity item bank v2.0.

Authors:  Erik-Jan A Haan; Caroline B Terwee; Marieke F Van Wier; Nienke W Willigenburg; Derek F P Van Deurzen; Martijn F Pisters; Aaron J Kaat; Leo D Roorda
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.