Erik-Jan A Haan1,2,3, Caroline B Terwee2, Marieke F Van Wier4, Nienke W Willigenburg4, Derek F P Van Deurzen4, Martijn F Pisters1, Aaron J Kaat5, Leo D Roorda6. 1. Physical Therapy Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.roorda@reade.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a Dutch-Flemish translation of the PROMIS® upper extremity (PROMIS-UE) item bank v2.0, and to investigate its cross-cultural and construct validity as well as its floor and ceiling effects in patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders. METHODS: State of the art translation methodology was used to develop the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0. The item bank and four legacy instruments were administered to 205 Dutch patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The validity of cross-cultural comparisons between English and Dutch patients was evaluated by studying differential item functioning (DIF) for language (Dutch vs. English) with ordinal logistic regression models and McFadden's pseudo R2-change of ≥ 2% as critical value. Construct validity was assessed by formulating a priori hypotheses and calculating correlations with legacy instruments. Floor/ceiling effects were evaluated by determining the proportion of patients who achieved the lowest/highest possible raw score. RESULTS: Eight items showed DIF for language, but their impact on the test score was negligible. The item bank correlated, as hypothesized, moderately with the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain intensity item (Pearson's r = - 0.43) and strongly with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Subscale Disability/Symptoms (Spearman's ρ = - 0.87), the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (ρ = - 0.86), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Subscale Activities of Daily Living (ρ = 0.87). No patients achieved the lowest or highest possible raw score. CONCLUSIONS: A Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0 has been developed that showed sufficient cross-cultural and construct validity as well as absence of floor and ceiling effects.
PURPOSE: To develop a Dutch-Flemish translation of the PROMIS® upper extremity (PROMIS-UE) item bank v2.0, and to investigate its cross-cultural and construct validity as well as its floor and ceiling effects in patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders. METHODS: State of the art translation methodology was used to develop the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0. The item bank and four legacy instruments were administered to 205 Dutch patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The validity of cross-cultural comparisons between English and Dutch patients was evaluated by studying differential item functioning (DIF) for language (Dutch vs. English) with ordinal logistic regression models and McFadden's pseudo R2-change of ≥ 2% as critical value. Construct validity was assessed by formulating a priori hypotheses and calculating correlations with legacy instruments. Floor/ceiling effects were evaluated by determining the proportion of patients who achieved the lowest/highest possible raw score. RESULTS: Eight items showed DIF for language, but their impact on the test score was negligible. The item bank correlated, as hypothesized, moderately with the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain intensity item (Pearson's r = - 0.43) and strongly with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Subscale Disability/Symptoms (Spearman's ρ = - 0.87), the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (ρ = - 0.86), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Subscale Activities of Daily Living (ρ = 0.87). No patients achieved the lowest or highest possible raw score. CONCLUSIONS: A Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0 has been developed that showed sufficient cross-cultural and construct validity as well as absence of floor and ceiling effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
Construct validity; Cross-cultural validity; Floor and ceiling effects; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); Upper extremity
Authors: Casey M Beleckas; Alex Padovano; Jason Guattery; Aaron M Chamberlain; Jay D Keener; Ryan P Calfee Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Martine H P Crins; Caroline B Terwee; Oguzhan Ogreden; Wouter Schuller; Paul Dekker; Gerard Flens; Daphne C Rohrich; Leo D Roorda Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Bionka M A Huisstede; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Bart W Koes; Jan A N Verhaar Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Louise Klokker; Caroline B Terwee; Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens; Marius Henriksen; Sandra Nolte; Gregor Liegl; Margreet Kloppenburg; Rene Westhoven; Ruth Wittoek; Ingvild Kjeken; Ida K Haugen; Ben Schalet; Richard Gershon; Henning Bliddal; Robin Christensen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: M Thoomes-de Graaf; G G M Scholten-Peeters; J M Schellingerhout; A M Bourne; R Buchbinder; M Koehorst; C B Terwee; A P Verhagen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: C M Lameijer; S G J van Bruggen; E J A Haan; D F P Van Deurzen; K Van der Elst; V Stouten; A J Kaat; L D Roorda; C B Terwee Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sreten Franovic; Collin Schlosser; Eric Guo; Luke Hessburg; Noah A Kuhlmann; Kelechi R Okoroha; Eric C Makhni Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-01-29
Authors: Inger L Abma; Bas J D Butje; Peter M Ten Klooster; Philip J van der Wees Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 3.186