Literature DB >> 10382797

The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change.

K C Chung1, J B Hamill, M R Walters, R A Hayward.   

Abstract

Responsiveness is an important property of an outcomes questionnaire. It can be defined as the ability of an instrument to capture important changes in a patient's health status over time. The authors previously designed the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), a hand-specific outcomes instrument that contains six distinct scales: (1) overall hand function, (2) activities of daily living, (3) pain, (4) work performance, (5) aesthetics, and (6) patient satisfaction with hand function. In the first study, the authors demonstrated that the MHQ is a reliable and valid instrument for the hand. The purpose of this second study is to assess the responsiveness, or sensitivity, of the MHQ to clinical change in patient status. A total of 187 consecutive patients with chronic hand disorders completed a baseline MHQ prior to receiving treatment at a university plastic surgery clinic. Approximately 6 to 18 months after completing the first questionnaire, patients were sent a follow-up MHQ by mail. The second questionnaire was identical to the first, with the exception of one additional question added to each of the six MHQ scales. This additional question asked patients to rate the change in their hands since completing the last questionnaire using a seven-point response scale. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to correlate the responses from patients' self-assessment questions with the actual score change (after score - before score). The response rate for the second administration was 49% (92 questionnaires returned)-a fairly good rate of return for mail surveys. There were no significant differences in gender, race, education, and income between responders and nonresponders. When patients' self-assessment of change was correlated with the change in the six scale scores over time, all six correlations were statistically significant, with p < 0.05. The correlations ranged from 0.25 for the aesthetics scale to 0.43 for the pain scale. The MHQ was responsive using patients' self-assessment of their clinical change. Future studies will evaluate the responsiveness of the MHQ compared with objective physiological measures such as grip strength, range of motion, and the Jebson-Taylor test. Additionally, research is underway to assess the responsiveness of the MHQ for specific procedures, including metacarpophalangeal arthroplasties for rheumatoid arthritis and microvascular toe-to-hand reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10382797     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199906000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  65 in total

1.  Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study.

Authors:  Jennifer F Waljee; Kevin C Chung; H Myra Kim; Patricia B Burns; Frank D Burke; E F Shaw Wilgis; David A Fox
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Exploring the relation between impairment rating by DAS-28 and body function, activity participation, and environmental factors based on ICF hand core set in the patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Elif Gür Kabul; Ummuhan Baş Aslan; Bilge Başakçı Çalık; Murat Taşçı; Veli Çobankara
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Current status of outcomes research in carpal tunnel surgery.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2006-06

4.  Relationship between patient satisfaction and objective functional outcome after surgical treatment for distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Ann Haas
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 5.  Measuring Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment of Mutilating Hand Injuries: A Global Health Approach.

Authors:  Aviram M Giladi; Kavitha Ranganathan; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.907

6.  Establishing hand preference: why does it matter?

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Anam Taufiq
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-02-24

Review 7.  Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A C Van Son; J De Vries; J A Roukema; B L Den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.

Authors:  Erika Davis Sears; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the surgery for ulnar nerve (SUN) study group.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Jennifer F Waljee; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung; R Glenn Gaston; Steven C Haase; Warren C Hammert; Jeffrey N Lawton; Greg A Merrell; Paul F Nassab; Lynda J S Yang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  A prospective outcomes study of Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the rheumatoid hand.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Sandra V Kotsis; H Myra Kim
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.