PURPOSE: Obese men have been reported to have lower serum PSA values relative to normal-weight men in population-based studies, screening cohorts, and in men with prostate cancer (CaP) treated with surgery. There are concerns that PSA may be less accurate in detecting prostate cancer in men with increased body mass index (BMI). We determine whether the diagnostic potential of PSA is negatively influenced by obesity by comparing its operating characteristics across BMI categories among men undergoing prostate biopsy. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data on 917 men who underwent trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy from 2002 to 2010 at a University hospital in Italy were used in the study. Men were categorized for BMI as follows: <25 kg/m(2) (normal weight), 25-29.9 kg/m(2) (overweight), and ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (obese). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess PSA accuracy for predicting prostate cancer overall and then stratified according to digital rectal examination (DRE) findings using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: The obesity rate of the study cohort was 21 %. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall AUCs of PSA for predicting CaP among normal-weight (AUC = 0.56), overweight (AUC = 0.60), and obese men (AUC = 0.60; p = 0.68) in either DRE-positive or negative men. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of Italian men undergoing prostate biopsy, the performance accuracy of PSA as a predictor of CaP is not significantly altered by BMI. Obesity does not negatively impact the overall ability of PSA to discriminate between CaP and benign conditions.
PURPOSE:Obesemen have been reported to have lower serum PSA values relative to normal-weight men in population-based studies, screening cohorts, and in men with prostate cancer (CaP) treated with surgery. There are concerns that PSA may be less accurate in detecting prostate cancer in men with increased body mass index (BMI). We determine whether the diagnostic potential of PSA is negatively influenced by obesity by comparing its operating characteristics across BMI categories among men undergoing prostate biopsy. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data on 917 men who underwent trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy from 2002 to 2010 at a University hospital in Italy were used in the study. Men were categorized for BMI as follows: <25 kg/m(2) (normal weight), 25-29.9 kg/m(2) (overweight), and ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (obese). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess PSA accuracy for predicting prostate cancer overall and then stratified according to digital rectal examination (DRE) findings using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: The obesity rate of the study cohort was 21 %. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall AUCs of PSA for predicting CaP among normal-weight (AUC = 0.56), overweight (AUC = 0.60), and obesemen (AUC = 0.60; p = 0.68) in either DRE-positive or negative men. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of Italian men undergoing prostate biopsy, the performance accuracy of PSA as a predictor of CaP is not significantly altered by BMI. Obesity does not negatively impact the overall ability of PSA to discriminate between CaP and benign conditions.
Authors: J H Fowke; S S Motley; M S Cookson; R Concepcion; S S Chang; M L Wills; J A Smith Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Constanza López Fontana; María Eugenia Maselli; Rafael Pérez Elizalde; Nicolás Di Milta; Pablo Corica Alberto; Jose Daniel López Laur Journal: Arch Esp Urol Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.436
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Chen Chi; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Scott M Lippman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert L Grubb; Amanda Black; Grant Izmirlian; Thomas P Hickey; Paul F Pinsky; Jerome E Mabie; Thomas L Riley; Lawrence R Ragard; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg; E David Crawford; Timothy R Church; Gerald L Andriole Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lionel L Bañez; Leon Sun; Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Judd W Moul; Stephen J Freedland Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: A S Parker; D D Thiel; E Bergstralh; R E Carlson; L J Rangel; R W Joseph; N Diehl; R J Karnes Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Angeles Sanchis-Bonet; Nelson Morales-Palacios; Marta Barrionuevo-Gonzalez; Luis-Enrique Ortega-Polledo; Francisco-Javier Ortiz-Vico; Manuel Sanchez-Chapado Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2017-01-03