Literature DB >> 19258274

Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir predict suboptimal therapeutic concentrations in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.

Natella Rakhmanina1, John van den Anker, Aline Baghdassarian, Steven Soldin, Keetra Williams, Michael N Neely.   

Abstract

In adult protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients, a lopinavir (LPV) phenotypic inhibitory quotient (PIQ) of >15 has been associated with a higher likelihood of viral suppression. The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of LPV in children and to estimate the probability of achieving a PIQ of >15. HIV-infected, PI-experienced children receiving LPV were intensively sampled for 12 h to measure plasma LPV. The data were fitted to candidate PK models (using MM-USCPACK software), and the final model was used to simulate 1,000 children to determine the probability of achieving an LPV PIQ of >15. In 50 patients (4 to 18 years old), the median LPV plasma 12-hour-postdose concentration was 5.9 mg/liter (range, 0.03 to 16.2 mg/liter) lower than that reported in adults. After a delay, LPV was absorbed linearly into a central compartment whose size was dependent on the weight and age of the patient. Elimination was dependent on weight. The regression line of observed versus predicted LPV had an R(2) of 0.99 and a slope of 1.0. Visual predictive checks against all available measured concentrations showed good predictive ability of the model. The probability of achieving an LPV PIQ of >15 was >90% for wild-type virus but <10% for even moderately resistant virus. The currently recommended dose of LPV/ritonavir appears to be adequate for children infected with wild-type virus but is unlikely to provide adequate inhibitory concentrations for even moderately resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). PI-experienced HIV-infected children will likely benefit from longitudinal, repeated LPV measurement in plasma to ensure that drug exposure is most often near the maximal end of the observed safe range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258274      PMCID: PMC2687254          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01374-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

1.  Simple rapid method for quantification of antiretrovirals by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry.

Authors:  Andrew Volosov; Christopher Alexander; Lillian Ting; Steven J Soldin
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  International interlaboratory quality control program for measurement of antiretroviral drugs in plasma.

Authors:  Rob E Aarnoutse; Corrien P W G M Verweij-van Wissen; Eleonora W J van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer; Eveline W Wuis; Peter P Koopmans; Yechiel A Hekster; David M Burger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit.

Authors:  S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Lopinavir measurement in pleural effusion in a human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patient with kaposi's sarcoma.

Authors:  Marta Boffito; Patrick G Hoggard; David J Back; Stefano Bonora; Agostino Maiello; Anna Lucchini; Giovanni Di Perri
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Improved method for concurrent quantification of antiretrovirals by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amit K Ghoshal; Steven J Soldin
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Virological, intracellular and plasma pharmacological parameters predicting response to lopinavir/ritonavir (KALEPHAR study).

Authors:  Dominique Breilh; Isabelle Pellegrin; Agnés Rouzés; Karine Berthoin; Fabien Xuereb; Hélène Budzinski; Michèle Munck; Hervé J A Fleury; Marie-Claude Saux; Jean-Luc Pellegrin
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Clinical use of lopinavir/ritonavir in a salvage therapy setting: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Marta Boffito; Isabella Arnaudo; Riccardo Raiteri; Stefano Bonora; Alessandro Sinicco; Antonio Di Garbo; Helen E Reynolds; Patrick G Hoggard; David J Back; Giovanni Di Perri
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of lopinavir-ritonavir in combination with efavirenz and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in extensively pretreated human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Authors:  Ann Hsu; Jeffrey Isaacson; Scott Brun; Barry Bernstein; Wayne Lam; Richard Bertz; Cheryl Foit; Karen Rynkiewicz; Bruce Richards; Martin King; Richard Rode; Dale J Kempf; G Richard Granneman; Eugene Sun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Forty-eight-week evaluation of lopinavir/ritonavir, a new protease inhibitor, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.

Authors:  Xavier Sáez-Llorens; Avyi Violari; Carl O Deetz; Richard A Rode; Perry Gomez; Edward Handelsman; Stephen Pelton; Octavio Ramilo; Pedro Cahn; Ellen Chadwick; Upton Allen; Stephen Arpadi; Maria Mercedes Castrejón; Renee S Heuser; Dale J Kempf; Richard J Bertz; Ann F Hsu; Barry Bernstein; Cheryl L Renz; Eugene Sun
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence of non-compliance.

Authors:  Song Mu; Thomas M Ludden
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.745

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of antiretroviral therapy in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Natella Y Rakhmanina
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Can therapeutic drug monitoring improve pharmacotherapy of HIV infection in adolescents?

Authors:  Natella Y Rakhmanina; John N van den Anker; Steven J Soldin; Ron H van Schaik; Nick Mordwinkin; Michael N Neely
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in combination with rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment in HIV-infected children.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Helen McIlleron; Yuan Ren; Jan-Stefan van der Walt; Mats O Karlsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Paolo Denti
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2012

4.  Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir determined with an ELISA test in youths with perinatally acquired HIV.

Authors:  Roberta Prinapori; Raffaella Rosso; Antonio Di Biagio; Franca Miletich; Elisa Furfaro; Lucia Taramasso; Francesca Ginocchio; Vania Giacomet; Loredana Nulvesu; Maria Pia Sormani; Irene Schiavetti; Alessio Signori; Laura De Hoffer; Claudio Viscoli
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  CYP3A5, ABCB1, and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics and virologic outcome of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children.

Authors:  Natella Y Rakhmanina; Michael N Neely; Ron H N Van Schaik; Heather A Gordish-Dressman; Keetra D Williams; Steven J Soldin; John N van den Anker
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy after switch to once-daily lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children.

Authors:  Frantz Foissac; Saïk Urien; Déborah Hirt; Pierre Frange; Marie-Laure Chaix; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Stéphane Blanche
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Assessment of lopinavir pharmacokinetics with respect to developmental changes in infants and the impact on weight band-based dosing.

Authors:  M Nikanjam; E G Chadwick; B Robbins; C Alvero; P Palumbo; R Yogev; J Pinto; R Hazra; M L Hughes; B E Heckman; E V Capparelli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  It is time to consider third-line options in antiretroviral-experienced paediatric patients?

Authors:  Gert U van Zyl; Helena Rabie; James J Nuttall; Mark F Cotton
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.396

9.  Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir crushed versus whole tablets in children.

Authors:  Brookie M Best; Edmund V Capparelli; Huy Diep; Steven S Rossi; Michael J Farrell; Elaine Williams; Grace Lee; John N van den Anker; Natella Rakhmanina
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir: Changes Across Formulations and Human Development From Infancy Through Adulthood.

Authors:  Jincheng Yang; Mina Nikanjam; Brookie M Best; Jorge Pinto; Ellen G Chadwick; Eric S Daar; Peter L Havens; Natella Rakhmanina; Edmund V Capparelli
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.