OBJECTIVE:Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) is first-line therapy for pediatric HIV infection. In clinical practice, Kaletra tablets are occasionally crushed for pediatric administration. This study compared lopinavir/ritonavir exposure between whole and crushed tablets in HIV-infected children. DESIGN: This was a randomized, open-label, cross-over study of pediatric patients takinglopinavir/ritonaviras part of their antiretroviral regimen. Each subject had 2 separate (within 30 days) steady-state 12-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) studies with crushed and whole 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir tablets. METHODS:PK blood samples were drawn at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. Lopinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations measured by high-performance liquid chromatography were used to calculate non-compartmental area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and clearance. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared PK values between crushed and whole tablets. RESULTS:Twelve children, median age of 13 years (10-16 years), took 550/138 mg·m(-2) per day lopinavir/ritonavir divided every 12 hours. The median lopinavir AUC after crushed and whole tablets were 92 mg·hr·L(-1) and 144 mg·hr·L(-1), respectively, with an AUC ratio of 0.55 (P = 0.003). Median ritonavir AUC of crushed and whole tablets were 7 mg·hr·L(-1) and 13.3 mg·hr·L(-1), respectively, with an AUC ratio of 0.53 (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of crushed 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir tablets to children significantly reduced lopinavir and ritonavir exposure with a decrease in AUC by 45% and 47%, respectively. The administration of crushed tablets would require higher doses and therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure adequate lopinavir exposure in patients requiring this practice. The use of crushed lopinavir/ritonavir tablets should be avoided, if possible.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) is first-line therapy for pediatric HIV infection. In clinical practice, Kaletra tablets are occasionally crushed for pediatric administration. This study compared lopinavir/ritonavir exposure between whole and crushed tablets in HIV-infectedchildren. DESIGN: This was a randomized, open-label, cross-over study of pediatric patients taking lopinavir/ritonavir as part of their antiretroviral regimen. Each subject had 2 separate (within 30 days) steady-state 12-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) studies with crushed and whole 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir tablets. METHODS: PK blood samples were drawn at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. Lopinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations measured by high-performance liquid chromatography were used to calculate non-compartmental area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and clearance. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared PK values between crushed and whole tablets. RESULTS: Twelve children, median age of 13 years (10-16 years), took 550/138 mg·m(-2) per day lopinavir/ritonavir divided every 12 hours. The median lopinavir AUC after crushed and whole tablets were 92 mg·hr·L(-1) and 144 mg·hr·L(-1), respectively, with an AUC ratio of 0.55 (P = 0.003). Median ritonavir AUC of crushed and whole tablets were 7 mg·hr·L(-1) and 13.3 mg·hr·L(-1), respectively, with an AUC ratio of 0.53 (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of crushed 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir tablets to children significantly reduced lopinavir and ritonavir exposure with a decrease in AUC by 45% and 47%, respectively. The administration of crushed tablets would require higher doses and therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure adequate lopinavir exposure in patients requiring this practice. The use of crushed lopinavir/ritonavir tablets should be avoided, if possible.
Authors: Diane T Holland; Robin DiFrancesco; Judith Stone; Fayez Hamzeh; James D Connor; Gene D Morse Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Natella Y Rakhmanina; John N van den Anker; Steven J Soldin; Ron H van Schaik; Nick Mordwinkin; Michael N Neely Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Russell B Van Dyke; Sophia Lee; George M Johnson; Andrew Wiznia; Kathleen Mohan; Kenneth Stanley; Edward V Morse; Paul A Krogstad; Sharon Nachman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Amanda H Corbett; Mina C Hosseinipour; Jean Nyirenda; Cecelia Kanyama; Naser L Rezk; Pax Mkupani; Dorothy Sichali; Hsiao Tien; Angela Dm Kashuba; Charles Mwansambo; Ralf Weigel; Peter Kazembe Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2010
Authors: Becky Chandler; Lisa Almond; Jennifer Ford; Andrew Owen; Patrick Hoggard; Saye Khoo; David Back Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Paolo Denti; Anneke C Hesseling; Louvina E van der Laan; Anthony J Garcia-Prats; H Simon Schaaf; Tjokosela Tikiso; Lubbe Wiesner; Mine de Kock; Jana Winckler; Jennifer Norman; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Roberta Prinapori; Raffaella Rosso; Antonio Di Biagio; Franca Miletich; Elisa Furfaro; Lucia Taramasso; Francesca Ginocchio; Vania Giacomet; Loredana Nulvesu; Maria Pia Sormani; Irene Schiavetti; Alessio Signori; Laura De Hoffer; Claudio Viscoli Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2013-09-07 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Adeodata Kekitiinwa; Victor Musiime; Margaret J Thomason; Grace Mirembe; Marc Lallemant; Sarah Nakalanzi; David Baptiste; A Sarah Walker; Diana M Gibb; Ali Judd Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2016-04-29
Authors: Jincheng Yang; Mina Nikanjam; Brookie M Best; Jorge Pinto; Ellen G Chadwick; Eric S Daar; Peter L Havens; Natella Rakhmanina; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: R Court; M T Chirehwa; L Wiesner; N de Vries; J Harding; T Gumbo; G Maartens; H McIlleron Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Yaseen M Arabi; Anthony C Gordon; Lennie P G Derde; Alistair D Nichol; Srinivas Murthy; Farah Al Beidh; Djillali Annane; Lolowa Al Swaidan; Abi Beane; Richard Beasley; Lindsay R Berry; Zahra Bhimani; Marc J M Bonten; Charlotte A Bradbury; Frank M Brunkhorst; Meredith Buxton; Adrian Buzgau; Allen Cheng; Menno De Jong; Michelle A Detry; Eamon J Duffy; Lise J Estcourt; Mark Fitzgerald; Rob Fowler; Timothy D Girard; Ewan C Goligher; Herman Goossens; Rashan Haniffa; Alisa M Higgins; Thomas E Hills; Christopher M Horvat; David T Huang; Andrew J King; Francois Lamontagne; Patrick R Lawler; Roger Lewis; Kelsey Linstrum; Edward Litton; Elizabeth Lorenzi; Salim Malakouti; Daniel F McAuley; Anna McGlothlin; Shay Mcguinness; Bryan J McVerry; Stephanie K Montgomery; Susan C Morpeth; Paul R Mouncey; Katrina Orr; Rachael Parke; Jane C Parker; Asad E Patanwala; Kathryn M Rowan; Marlene S Santos; Christina T Saunders; Christopher W Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Steven Y C Tong; Alexis F Turgeon; Anne M Turner; Frank Leo Van de Veerdonk; Ryan Zarychanski; Cameron Green; Scott Berry; John C Marshall; Colin McArthur; Derek C Angus; Steven A Webb Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 17.440