BACKGROUND: The preferred antiretroviral regimen for young children previously exposed to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is lopinavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment reduces lopinavir concentrations. Adding extra ritonavir to lopinavir/ritonavir overcomes the effect of rifampicin, however this approach is not feasible in many settings. METHODS: We developed an integrated population model describing lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics to predict lopinavir/ritonavir (4:1) doses achieving target lopinavir exposures in children treated for tuberculosis. The model included data from 15 children given 'super-boosted' lopinavir (lopinavir/ritonavir =1:1) and 20 children given twice the standard dose of lopinavir/ritonavir every 12 h during antitubercular treatment, and from children given standard lopinavir/ritonavir doses every 12 h (39 without tuberculosis and 11 sampled again after antitubercular treatment). RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and a one-compartment model with transit absorption compartments described ritonavir pharmacokinetics. The dynamic influence of ritonavir concentration on lopinavir oral clearance was modelled as direct inhibition with an E(max) model. Antitubercular treatment reduced the oral bioavailability of lopinavir by 77% in children receiving twice usual lopinavir/ritonavir doses and increased ritonavir clearance by 50%. Simulations predicted that respective 27, 21, 20 and 18 mg/kg 8-hourly doses of lopinavir (in lopinavir/ritonavir, 4:1) maintains lopinavir concentrations >1 mg/l in at least 95% of children weighing 3-5.9, 6-9.9, 10-13.9 and 14-19.9 kg. CONCLUSIONS: The model describing the interactions between lopinavir, ritonavir and rifampicin in young children predicted feasible 8-hourly doses of lopinavir/ritonavir resulting in therapeutic lopinavir concentrations during antitubercular treatment.
BACKGROUND: The preferred antiretroviral regimen for young children previously exposed to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is lopinavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment reduces lopinavir concentrations. Adding extra ritonavir to lopinavir/ritonavir overcomes the effect of rifampicin, however this approach is not feasible in many settings. METHODS: We developed an integrated population model describing lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics to predict lopinavir/ritonavir (4:1) doses achieving target lopinavir exposures in children treated for tuberculosis. The model included data from 15 children given 'super-boosted' lopinavir (lopinavir/ritonavir =1:1) and 20 children given twice the standard dose of lopinavir/ritonavir every 12 h during antitubercular treatment, and from children given standard lopinavir/ritonavir doses every 12 h (39 without tuberculosis and 11 sampled again after antitubercular treatment). RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and a one-compartment model with transit absorption compartments described ritonavir pharmacokinetics. The dynamic influence of ritonavir concentration on lopinavir oral clearance was modelled as direct inhibition with an E(max) model. Antitubercular treatment reduced the oral bioavailability of lopinavir by 77% in children receiving twice usual lopinavir/ritonavir doses and increased ritonavir clearance by 50%. Simulations predicted that respective 27, 21, 20 and 18 mg/kg 8-hourly doses of lopinavir (in lopinavir/ritonavir, 4:1) maintains lopinavir concentrations >1 mg/l in at least 95% of children weighing 3-5.9, 6-9.9, 10-13.9 and 14-19.9 kg. CONCLUSIONS: The model describing the interactions between lopinavir, ritonavir and rifampicin in young children predicted feasible 8-hourly doses of lopinavir/ritonavir resulting in therapeutic lopinavir concentrations during antitubercular treatment.
Authors: Helen McIlleron; Yuan Ren; James Nuttall; Lee Fairlie; Helena Rabie; Mark Cotton; Brian Eley; Tammy Meyers; Peter J Smith; Concepta Merry; Gary Maartens Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2011
Authors: Yuan Ren; James J C Nuttall; Claire Egbers; Brian S Eley; Tammy M Meyers; Peter J Smith; Gary Maartens; Helen M McIlleron Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Elisabetta Walters; Mark F Cotton; Helena Rabie; H Simon Schaaf; Lourens O Walters; Ben J Marais Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Chao Zhang; Paolo Denti; Eric H Decloedt; Yuan Ren; Mats O Karlsson; Helen McIlleron Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Mutsa Bwakura Dangarembizi; Pearl Samson; Edmund V Capparelli; Carolyn Bolton Moore; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Stephen A Spector; Nahida Chakhtoura; Alex Benns; Bonnie Zimmer; Lynette Purdue; Chivon Jackson; Carole Wallis; Jennifer L Libous; Ellen G Chadwick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Theresa M Rossouw; Ute D Feucht; George Melikian; Gisela van Dyk; Winifred Thomas; Nicolette M du Plessis; Theunis Avenant Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kazeem A Oshikoya; Ibrahim A Oreagba; Saheed Lawal; Olufunsho Awodele; Olayinka O Ogunleye; Idowu O Senbanjo; Sunday O Olayemi; Veronica C Ezeaka; Edamisan O Temiye; Titilope A Adeyemo; Oluranti Opanuga; Olufunmilayo A Lesi; Sulaimon A Akanmu Journal: HIV AIDS (Auckl) Date: 2014-04-05
Authors: Tom G Jacobs; Elin M Svensson; Victor Musiime; Pablo Rojo; Kelly E Dooley; Helen McIlleron; Rob E Aarnoutse; David M Burger; Anna Turkova; Angela Colbers Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 5.790