Literature DB >> 23184562

Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?

Marco Moscarelli1, Leanne Harling, Hutan Ashrafian, Thanos Athanasiou.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting should be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization. Eighty-two papers were identified by a systematic search, of which nine were judged to best answer the clinical question. Of these, one was a randomized controlled trial and the remaining eight were retrospective observational studies. The author, journal, date, patient group, country of publication, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. In total, these nine studies included 3001 patients (n = 817 OPCAB, 2184 ONCAB) undergoing emergency revascularization in the setting of ACS. The timing between the onset of ACS and operative intervention ranged from 6 to 72 h. All cases were categorized as urgent/emergent according to the National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death classification of intervention. Six studies included patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock; however the majority of patients were haemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Three out of nine studies showed an improvement in 30-day mortality with OPCAB although the remaining six reveal no significant mortality benefit. No difference in long-term mortality was observed between the two techniques. OPCAB was associated with significantly fewer grafts per patient (six studies) and less complete revascularization (two studies). We conclude that whilst OPCAB may have a beneficial effect on 30-day mortality in haemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency revascularization, there is a lack of high-quality data with clearly defined patient demographics. Future studies must ensure adequate preoperative matching between OPCAB and ONCAB groups and clearly categorize haemodynamic status, disease pattern and time to surgery in order to determine the patients in whom OPCAB may confer the greatest benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184562      PMCID: PMC3568801          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  10 in total

1.  Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS.

Authors:  Joel Dunning; Brian Prendergast; Kevin Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-12

2.  Immediate and intermediate outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Muhammad Ali Asim Mahar; Martti Mosorin; Jouni Heikkinen; Matti Pokela; Panu Taskinen; Vesa Anttila; Jarmo Lahtinen; Martti Lepojärvi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  To be or not to be: the importance of attendance in integrated physiology teaching using non-traditional approaches.

Authors:  Beatriz Gal; Ignacio Busturia; Concepción Garrido
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-09-14

4.  Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed safely without cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients.

Authors:  Faraz Kerendi; John D Puskas; Joseph M Craver; William A Cooper; Ellis L Jones; Omar M Lattouf; J David Vega; Robert A Guyton
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass is a safe option in patients presenting as emergency.

Authors:  Eliana C Martinez; Maximilian Y Emmert; George N Thomas; Lorenz S Emmert; Chuen Neng Lee; Theo Kofidis
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency surgery.

Authors:  Masami Ochi; Nobuo Hatori; Yoshiaki Saji; Shunichiro Sakamoto; Dai Nishina; Shigeo Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.520

7.  Emergency myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: survival benefits of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  C Locker; I Shapira; Y Paz; A Kramer; J Gurevitch; M Matsa; D Pevni; R Mohr
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass for emergency myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Ahmad K Darwazah; Raed A H Abu Sham'a; Ismail Isleem; Basel Hanbali; Bashar Jaber
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2009-04

9.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis.

Authors:  Kaan Kaya; Raif Cavolli; Alpaslan Telli; Mehmet Fazil Tolga Soyal; Alp Aslan; Gökhan Gokaslan; Sahin Mursel; Refik Tasoz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Khalil Fattouch; Francesco Guccione; Pietro Dioguardi; Roberta Sampognaro; Egle Corrado; Marco Caruso; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The current status of multi-arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki; Asai Tohru
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications.

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; B C Ramesh; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.