Literature DB >> 19256079

Prey envenomation does not improve digestive performance in Taiwanese pit vipers (Trimeresurus gracilis and T. stejnegeri stejnegeri).

Chia-Wei Chu1, Tein-Shun Tsai, Inn-Ho Tsai, Yao-Sung Lin, Ming-Chung Tu.   

Abstract

It has been a common belief that snake venom may help in the digestion of its prey, although direct examples and supporting evidence have not been sufficient. To address this, the present study examined whether preinjecting natural amounts of pit viper venom into experimental mice may accelerate their digestion by the snakes or gain energy benefit as compared to the control without the envenomation. Live adults of two Asian pit viper species Trimeresurus gracilis and T. stejnegeri stejnegeri, which inhabit the cold and warm environment respectively, were the subjects studied herein. A natural dose of 1.2 mg of each of the pit viper venom in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was injected into the mouse (about 10% of the snake mass) before it was being fed to the same species of vipers, while the pit vipers in control group were given mouse injected with sterile PBS. The snakes were kept at 14 degrees C or 24 degrees C, and parameters of gut passage time, costs of digestion, and/or digestive efficiency were measured. The results did not support the hypotheses that envenomation facilitates prey digestion. The venom in fact caused longer first defecation time and lower assimilation energy at 14 degrees C. Besides, the time to reach the oxygen consumption peak, and the first defecation time of T. s. stejnegeri were longer than that of T. gracilis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19256079     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating local adaptation of a complex phenotype: reciprocal tests of pigmy rattlesnake venoms on treefrog prey.

Authors:  Sarah A Smiley-Walters; Terence M Farrell; H Lisle Gibbs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Therapeutic potential of snake venom in cancer therapy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Vivek Kumar Vyas; Keyur Brahmbhatt; Hardik Bhatt; Utsav Parmar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2013-02

3.  Proteolytic activity of Elapid and Viperid Snake venoms and its implication to digestion.

Authors:  Joshua L Bottrall; Frank Madaras; Christopher D Biven; Michael G Venning; Peter J Mirtschin
Journal:  J Venom Res       Date:  2010-09-30

Review 4.  Anticancer Activity of Toxins from Bee and Snake Venom-An Overview on Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Marius Alexandru Moga; Oana Gabriela Dimienescu; Cristian Andrei Arvătescu; Petru Ifteni; Liana Pleş
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Evidence for divergent patterns of local selection driving venom variation in Mojave Rattlesnakes (Crotalus scutulatus).

Authors:  Jason L Strickland; Cara F Smith; Andrew J Mason; Drew R Schield; Miguel Borja; Gamaliel Castañeda-Gaytán; Carol L Spencer; Lydia L Smith; Ann Trápaga; Nassima M Bouzid; Gustavo Campillo-García; Oscar A Flores-Villela; Daniel Antonio-Rangel; Stephen P Mackessy; Todd A Castoe; Darin R Rokyta; Christopher L Parkinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Energy expenses on prey processing are comparable, but paid at a higher metabolic scope and for a longer time in ambush vs active predators: a multispecies study on snakes.

Authors:  Stanisław Bury
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Quantitative high-throughput profiling of snake venom gland transcriptomes and proteomes (Ovophis okinavensis and Protobothrops flavoviridis).

Authors:  Steven D Aird; Yutaka Watanabe; Alejandro Villar-Briones; Michael C Roy; Kouki Terada; Alexander S Mikheyev
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.