| Literature DB >> 21544178 |
Joshua L Bottrall, Frank Madaras, Christopher D Biven, Michael G Venning, Peter J Mirtschin.
Abstract
Testing whether venoms may aid in digestion of the prey, eleven snake venoms were compared for the presence of proteases and endopeptidases that function in alkaline pH conditions. In vitro experiments examined the relative protease and endopeptidase activity of the venoms, which involved combining bovine muscle and snake venom in a buffered solution, encased within dialysis tubing. This mixture was then incubated at room temperature (∼20°C) for 24hr, with constant shaking. Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and ninhydrin assay were used to determine peptide and amino acid concentrations. Histological and immunohistochemical investigations using N. kaouthia venom confirmed in vitro findings. Results show that B. arietans venom generated the highest amount of protein/peptides and amino acids in the dialysates, while O. scutellatus, N. ater niger and P. textilis venom did not show any significant protein degradation under alkaline conditions. Histological examination revealed varying degrees of muscle cell damage for each of the venom investigated, and the immunohistochemical study on N. kaouthia venom showed that the venom penetrated the muscle tissue to a significant degree. In vitro assays and histological results indicate that particular venoms may possess the ability to enhance digestion of bovine muscle tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Proteolytic activity; alkaline protease; digestion; elapid; venom; viperid
Year: 2010 PMID: 21544178 PMCID: PMC3086185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Venom Res
Figure 1.Apparatus in which the digestion experiments were performed. Dialysis tubing MWCO sizes vary between protein-peptide digestion experiment (12kDa) and amino acid (1kDa). After 24hr the 10ml of CSB buffer is termed the “Dialysate”.
Figure 2.Calculation for the total (corrected) protein/amino acid concentration in dialysate (the concentration in dialysate attributable to digestion of the muscle by the venom alone).
Protein assay results.
| Species | Protein (mg/ml) |
|---|---|
| 1.16 ± 0.30 | |
| 0.68 ± 0.03 | |
| 0.17 ± 0.08 | |
| 0.81 ± 0.06 | |
| 0.29 ± 0.11 | |
| 0.12 ± 0.06 | |
| 1.29 ± 0.09 | |
| 1.69 ± 0.19 | |
| 0.02 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.03 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.07 ± 0.04 |
*The three venoms that showed no statistically significant protein-peptide release included Oxyuranus scutellatus, Notechis ater niger, and Pseudonaja textilis.
Figure 3.Protein comparison.
Amino acid assay results.
| Species | Amino acid (µg/ml) |
|---|---|
| 142.58 ± 22.60 | |
| 279.31 ± 36.62 | |
| 0.00 ± 11.69 | |
| 0.02 ± 8.85 | |
| 48.69 ± 34.99 | |
| 16.14 ± 10.63 | |
| 7.34 ± 11.70 |
*Venoms that did not show a statistically significant increase when compared to the negative control.
Figure 4.Amino acid comparison.
Antivenom inhibition assay results.
| Antivenom concentration used | Protein concentration (mg/ml) | Protein concentration (mg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 ± 0.30 | 0.16 ± 0.08 | |
| 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.08 | |
| 1.29 ± 0.09 | 0.80 ± 0.23 |
*Before inhibition by Antivenom
**After inhibition by Antivenom
EDTA inhibition assay results.
| EDTA concentration | Protein concentration (mg/ml) | Protein concentration (mg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 ± 0.30 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | |
| 1.29 ± 0.09 | 0.28 ± 0.10 |
*Before inhibition by EDTA
**After inhibition by EDTA
Figure 5.Immunohistological findings. (A) Negative Control, (B) Control for non-specific DAB binding, (C) Background binding of DAB, (D) N. kaouthia test exhibiting brown DAB deposition formed when the DAB reacted with the HRP- anti cobra venom conjugate, (E) Area of muscle tissue without DAB precipitate present.
Figure 6.Histological findings. (A) Negative Control, (B) O. scutellatus test, (C) B. arietans test, (D) P. porphyriacus test.