Literature DB >> 19255849

Effectiveness of a provider reminder on fecal occult blood test follow-up.

Meaghan F Larson1, Cynthia W Ko, Jason A Dominitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of an electronic reminder upon the timeliness and proportion of patients referred for evaluation of a positive fecal occult blood test and receipt of colonoscopy.
METHODS: Outpatients (468) with a positive occult blood test were prospectively identified and had a note entered into their electronic medical record prompting their provider to act upon this result. The results were compared to 634 control patients from the prior year.
RESULTS: The intervention was associated with a 20.3% absolute increase in gastroenterology consultation within 14 days (P < 0.001) and significantly prompter consultation. The median time to colonoscopy decreased by 38 days during the intervention (P = <0.0001). A multivariable model found that the intervention was significantly associated with shorter time to consultation and colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: A simple electronic reminder is associated with a significant improvement in the proportion of patients referred for, and timeliness of, evaluation of a positive FOBT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255849     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0751-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A national survey of primary care physicians' methods for screening for fecal occult blood.

Authors:  Marion R Nadel; Jean A Shapiro; Carrie N Klabunde; Laura C Seeff; Robert Uhler; Robert A Smith; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Factors that influence the decision to do an adequate evaluation of a patient with a positive stool for occult blood.

Authors:  H M Shields; M S Weiner; D R Henry; J A Lloyd; B J Ransil; D A Lamphier; D W Gallagher; D A Antonioli; B A Rosner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Physician intention to recommend complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; T Hyslop; M Gerrity; N Schlackman; N Hanchak; J Grana; B J Turner; D Weinberg; W W Hauck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening result.

Authors:  Nadeem Baig; Ronald E Myers; Barbara J Turner; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Barbara Turner; Ronald E Myers; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; David Weinberg; Timothy Brigham; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Amy Leader; Elizabeth Neilson; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Barbara Turner; David Weinberg; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; Timothy Brigham; Todd Rothermel; James Grana; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  7 in total

1.  A centrally generated primary care physician audit report does not improve colonoscopy uptake after a positive result on a fecal occult blood test in Ontario's ColonCancerCheck program.

Authors:  D Stock; L Rabeneck; N N Baxter; L F Paszat; R Sutradhar; L Yun; J Tinmouth
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Bringing an organizational perspective to the optimal number of colorectal cancer screening options debate.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Adam A Powell; Diana J Burgess; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?

Authors:  Charlotte M Carlson; Katharine A Kirby; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin; Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-11

4.  Organizational predictors of colonoscopy follow-up for positive fecal occult blood test results: an observational study.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Diana J Burgess; James F Burgess; Amy Gravely; David Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; Sean Nugent; Adam A Powell; Aasma Shaukat; Louise C Walter; David B Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christine Baumgartner; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Joanne Schottinger; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Mailed participant reminders are associated with improved colonoscopy uptake after a positive FOBT result in Ontario's ColonCancerCheck program.

Authors:  David Stock; Linda Rabeneck; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence F Paszat; Rinku Sutradhar; Lingsong Yun; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 7.  What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Rachel B Issaka; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 11.382

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.