Literature DB >> 28270725

A centrally generated primary care physician audit report does not improve colonoscopy uptake after a positive result on a fecal occult blood test in Ontario's ColonCancerCheck program.

D Stock1, L Rabeneck2, N N Baxter3, L F Paszat4, R Sutradhar5, L Yun6, J Tinmouth7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely follow-up of fecal occult blood screening with colonoscopy is essential for achieving colorectal cancer mortality reduction. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of centrally generated, physician-targeted audit and feedback to improve colonoscopy uptake after a positive fecal occult blood test (fobt) result within Ontario's population-wide ColonCancerCheck Program.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study used data sets from Ontario's ColonCancerCheck Program (2008-2011) that were linked to provincial administrative health databases. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of centralized, physician-targeted audit and feedback on colonoscopy uptake in an Ontario-wide fobt-positive cohort.
RESULTS: A mailed physician audit and feedback report identifying individuals outstanding for colonoscopy for 3 or more months after a positive fobt result did not increase the likelihood of colonoscopy uptake (hazard ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 1.13). Duration of positive fobt status was strongly inversely associated with the hazard of follow-up colonoscopy (p for linear trend: <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large population-wide setting, centralized tracking in the form of physician-targeted mailed audit and feedback reports does not improve colonoscopy uptake for screening participants with a positive fobt result outstanding for 3 or more months. Mailed physician-targeted screening audit and feedback reports alone are unlikely to improve compliance with follow-up colonoscopy in Ontario. Other interventions such as physician audits or automatic referrals, demonstrated to be effective in other jurisdictions, might be warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal occult blood test; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; program evaluation; screening

Year:  2017        PMID: 28270725      PMCID: PMC5330629          DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  9 in total

1.  Improving the effectiveness of fecal occult blood testing in a primary care clinic by direct colonoscopy referral for positive tests.

Authors:  Erik Van Kleek; Shanlgei Liu; Lorraine M Conn; Angelina Hoadley; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.095

2.  Effectiveness of a provider reminder on fecal occult blood test follow-up.

Authors:  Meaghan F Larson; Cynthia W Ko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care.

Authors:  William G Paterson; William T Depew; Pierre Paré; Denis Petrunia; Connie Switzer; Sander J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sandra Daniels
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Improving the follow-up of positive hemoccult screening tests: an electronic intervention.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Jackilen Shannon; Melissa R Partin; Jean O'Malley; Zunqiu Chen; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: family physician perceptions.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Paul Ritvo; S Elizabeth McGregor; Criss Guglietti; Josh Green; Danielle Claus; Cheryl Levitt; Lawrence F Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Barbara Turner; David Weinberg; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; Timothy Brigham; Todd Rothermel; James Grana; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Improvement in the diagnostic evaluation of a positive fecal occult blood test in an integrated health care organization.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Carolyn M Rutter; Susan Carol Bradford; Ann G Zauber; Larry G Kessler; Eric J Feuer; David C Grossman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Mailed participant reminders are associated with improved colonoscopy uptake after a positive FOBT result in Ontario's ColonCancerCheck program.

Authors:  David Stock; Linda Rabeneck; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence F Paszat; Rinku Sutradhar; Lingsong Yun; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Clinical utility of a blood-based protein assay to increase screening of elevated-risk patients for colorectal cancer in the primary care setting.

Authors:  John Peabody; David Paculdo; Eric Swagel; Steven Fugaro; Mary Tran
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christine Baumgartner; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Joanne Schottinger; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Rachel B Issaka; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 11.382

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.