PURPOSE: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Current treatment decisions are based on clinical variables. Novel tumor-derived biomarkers may improve the risk stratification of medulloblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model for the molecular risk stratification was proposed from an array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) screen (n = 80). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses for chromosome arms 6q, 17p, and 17q and the MYC and MYCN loci were performed in an independent validation set (n = 260). Copy number aberrations were correlated with clinical, histologic, and survival data. RESULTS: Gain of 6q and 17q and genomic amplification of MYC or MYCN were each associated with poor outcome in the array-CGH study (n = 80). In contrast, all patients with 6q-deleted tumors survived. Given these findings, the following hierarchical molecular staging system was defined: (1) MYC/MYCN amplification, (2) 6q gain, (3) 17q gain, (4) 6q and 17q balanced, and (5) 6q deletion. The prognostic value of this staging system was investigated by FISH analysis (n = 260). The addition of molecular markers to clinical risk factors resulted in the identification of a large proportion of patients (72 of 260 patients; 30%) at high risk for relapse and death who would be considered standard risk by application of clinical variables alone. CONCLUSION: Genomic aberrations in medulloblastoma are powerful independent markers of disease progression and survival. By adding genomic markers to established clinical and histologic variables, outcome prediction can be substantially improved. Because the analyses can be conducted on routine paraffin-embedded material, it will be especially feasible to use this novel molecular staging system in large multicenter clinical trials.
PURPOSE:Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Current treatment decisions are based on clinical variables. Novel tumor-derived biomarkers may improve the risk stratification of medulloblastomapatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model for the molecular risk stratification was proposed from an array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) screen (n = 80). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses for chromosome arms 6q, 17p, and 17q and the MYC and MYCN loci were performed in an independent validation set (n = 260). Copy number aberrations were correlated with clinical, histologic, and survival data. RESULTS: Gain of 6q and 17q and genomic amplification of MYC or MYCN were each associated with poor outcome in the array-CGH study (n = 80). In contrast, all patients with 6q-deleted tumors survived. Given these findings, the following hierarchical molecular staging system was defined: (1) MYC/MYCN amplification, (2) 6q gain, (3) 17q gain, (4) 6q and 17q balanced, and (5) 6q deletion. The prognostic value of this staging system was investigated by FISH analysis (n = 260). The addition of molecular markers to clinical risk factors resulted in the identification of a large proportion of patients (72 of 260 patients; 30%) at high risk for relapse and death who would be considered standard risk by application of clinical variables alone. CONCLUSION: Genomic aberrations in medulloblastoma are powerful independent markers of disease progression and survival. By adding genomic markers to established clinical and histologic variables, outcome prediction can be substantially improved. Because the analyses can be conducted on routine paraffin-embedded material, it will be especially feasible to use this novel molecular staging system in large multicenter clinical trials.
Authors: David W Ellison; Mehmet Kocak; James Dalton; Hisham Megahed; Meryl E Lusher; Sarra L Ryan; Wei Zhao; Sarah Leigh Nicholson; Roger E Taylor; Simon Bailey; Steven C Clifford Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karen D Wright; Kendra von der Embse; Jamie Coleman; Zoltan Patay; David W Ellison; Amar Gajjar Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Shyamal Dilhan Weeraratne; Vladimir Amani; Natalia Teider; Jessica Pierre-Francois; Dominic Winter; Min Jeong Kye; Soma Sengupta; Tenley Archer; Marc Remke; Alfa H C Bai; Peter Warren; Stefan M Pfister; Judith A J Steen; Scott L Pomeroy; Yoon-Jae Cho Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Jingying Xu; Anat Erdreich-Epstein; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gomez; Elizabeth Y Melendez; Goar Smbatyan; Rex A Moats; Michael Rosol; Jaclyn A Biegel; C Patrick Reynolds Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-11-27 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Richard D Williams; Reem Al-Saadi; Tasnim Chagtai; Sergey Popov; Boo Messahel; Neil Sebire; Manfred Gessler; Jenny Wegert; Norbert Graf; Ivo Leuschner; Mike Hubank; Chris Jones; Gordan Vujanic; Kathy Pritchard-Jones Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jasmine Lau; Christin Schmidt; Shirley L Markant; Michael D Taylor; Robert J Wechsler-Reya; William A Weiss Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Ximena Bonilla; Laurent Parmentier; Bryan King; Fedor Bezrukov; Gürkan Kaya; Vincent Zoete; Vladimir B Seplyarskiy; Hayley J Sharpe; Thomas McKee; Audrey Letourneau; Pascale G Ribaux; Konstantin Popadin; Nicole Basset-Seguin; Rouaa Ben Chaabene; Federico A Santoni; Maria A Andrianova; Michel Guipponi; Marco Garieri; Carole Verdan; Kerstin Grosdemange; Olga Sumara; Martin Eilers; Iannis Aifantis; Olivier Michielin; Frederic J de Sauvage; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Sergey I Nikolaev Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 38.330