PURPOSE: Medulloblastomas are heterogeneous and include relatively good-prognosis tumors characterized by Wnt pathway activation, as well as those that cannot be successfully treated with conventional therapy. Developing a practical therapeutic stratification that allows accurate identification of disease risk offers the potential to individualize adjuvant therapy and to minimize long-term adverse effects in a subgroup of survivors. METHODS: Using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue for immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and direct sequencing to identify tumors with a Wnt pathway signature and those harboring copy number abnormalities (CNAs) of potential prognostic significance (MYC/MYCN amplification, CNAs of chromosome 6 and 17), we evaluated clinical, pathologic, and molecular outcome indicators and stratification models in a cohort (n = 207) of patients with medulloblastoma 3 to 16 years of age from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology CNS9102 (PNET3) trial. RESULTS: Metastatic disease and large-cell/anaplastic (LC/A) phenotype were the clinicopathologic variables associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS). Nuclear immunoreactivity for β-catenin, CTNNB1 mutation, and monosomy 6 all identified a group of good-prognosis patients. MYC amplification was associated with poor outcome, but other CNAs were not. Low-risk medulloblastomas were defined as β-catenin nucleopositive tumors without metastasis at presentation, LC/A phenotype, or MYC amplification. High-risk medulloblastomas were defined as tumors with metastatic disease, LC/A phenotype, or MYC amplification. Low-risk, standard-risk, and high-risk categories of medulloblastoma had significantly (P < .0001) different outcomes. CONCLUSION: Integrating assays of molecular biomarkers undertaken on routinely collected diagnostic FFPE tissue into stratification schemes for medulloblastoma alongside clinical and pathologic outcome indicators can refine current definition of disease risk and guide adjuvant therapy.
PURPOSE:Medulloblastomas are heterogeneous and include relatively good-prognosis tumors characterized by Wnt pathway activation, as well as those that cannot be successfully treated with conventional therapy. Developing a practical therapeutic stratification that allows accurate identification of disease risk offers the potential to individualize adjuvant therapy and to minimize long-term adverse effects in a subgroup of survivors. METHODS: Using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue for immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and direct sequencing to identify tumors with a Wnt pathway signature and those harboring copy number abnormalities (CNAs) of potential prognostic significance (MYC/MYCN amplification, CNAs of chromosome 6 and 17), we evaluated clinical, pathologic, and molecular outcome indicators and stratification models in a cohort (n = 207) of patients with medulloblastoma 3 to 16 years of age from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology CNS9102 (PNET3) trial. RESULTS:Metastatic disease and large-cell/anaplastic (LC/A) phenotype were the clinicopathologic variables associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS). Nuclear immunoreactivity for β-catenin, CTNNB1 mutation, and monosomy 6 all identified a group of good-prognosis patients. MYC amplification was associated with poor outcome, but other CNAs were not. Low-risk medulloblastomas were defined as β-catenin nucleopositive tumors without metastasis at presentation, LC/A phenotype, or MYC amplification. High-risk medulloblastomas were defined as tumors with metastatic disease, LC/A phenotype, or MYC amplification. Low-risk, standard-risk, and high-risk categories of medulloblastoma had significantly (P < .0001) different outcomes. CONCLUSION: Integrating assays of molecular biomarkers undertaken on routinely collected diagnostic FFPE tissue into stratification schemes for medulloblastoma alongside clinical and pathologic outcome indicators can refine current definition of disease risk and guide adjuvant therapy.
Authors: Steven C Clifford; Meryl E Lusher; Janet C Lindsey; Jacqueline A Langdon; Richard J Gilbertson; Debbie Straughton; David W Ellison Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Amar Gajjar; Murali Chintagumpala; David Ashley; Stewart Kellie; Larry E Kun; Thomas E Merchant; Shaio Woo; Greg Wheeler; Valerie Ahern; Matthew J Krasin; Maryam Fouladi; Alberto Broniscer; Robert Krance; Gregory A Hale; Clinton F Stewart; Robert Dauser; Robert A Sanford; Christine Fuller; Ching Lau; James M Boyett; Dana Wallace; Richard J Gilbertson Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Margaret C Thompson; Christine Fuller; Twala L Hogg; James Dalton; David Finkelstein; Ching C Lau; Murali Chintagumpala; Adekunle Adesina; David M Ashley; Stewart J Kellie; Michael D Taylor; Tom Curran; Amar Gajjar; Richard J Gilbertson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Duncan Stearns; Aneeka Chaudhry; Ty W Abel; Peter C Burger; Chi V Dang; Charles G Eberhart Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stefan Rutkowski; Nicolas Ulrich Gerber; Katja von Hoff; Astrid Gnekow; Udo Bode; Norbert Graf; Frank Berthold; Günter Henze; Johannes E A Wolff; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Niels Soerensen; Angela Emser; Holger Ottensmeier; Frank Deinlein; Paul-Gerhardt Schlegel; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Torsten Pietsch; Joachim Kuehl Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Stefan Pfister; Marc Remke; Axel Benner; Frank Mendrzyk; Grischa Toedt; Jörg Felsberg; Andrea Wittmann; Frauke Devens; Nicolas U Gerber; Stefan Joos; Andreas Kulozik; Guido Reifenberger; Stefan Rutkowski; Otmar D Wiestler; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Wolfram Scheurlen; Peter Lichter; Andrey Korshunov Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marcel Kool; Jan Koster; Jens Bunt; Nancy E Hasselt; Arjan Lakeman; Peter van Sluis; Dirk Troost; Netteke Schouten-van Meeteren; Huib N Caron; Jacqueline Cloos; Alan Mrsić; Bauke Ylstra; Wieslawa Grajkowska; Wolfgang Hartmann; Torsten Pietsch; David Ellison; Steven C Clifford; Rogier Versteeg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Regina I Jakacki; Peter C Burger; Tianni Zhou; Emiko J Holmes; Mehmet Kocak; Arzu Onar; Joel Goldwein; Minesh Mehta; Roger J Packer; Nancy Tarbell; Charles Fitz; Gilbert Vezina; Joanne Hilden; Ian F Pollack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jingying Xu; Anat Erdreich-Epstein; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gomez; Elizabeth Y Melendez; Goar Smbatyan; Rex A Moats; Michael Rosol; Jaclyn A Biegel; C Patrick Reynolds Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-11-27 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michael Mumert; Adrian Dubuc; Xiaochong Wu; Paul A Northcott; Steven S Chin; Carolyn A Pedone; Michael D Taylor; Daniel W Fults Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stefan Blüml; Ashley S Margol; Richard Sposto; Rebekah J Kennedy; Nathan J Robison; Marzieh Vali; Long T Hung; Sakunthala Muthugounder; Jonathan L Finlay; Anat Erdreich-Epstein; Floyd H Gilles; Alexander R Judkins; Mark D Krieger; Girish Dhall; Marvin D Nelson; Shahab Asgharzadeh Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 12.300