Literature DB >> 19254807

LB1's virtual endocast, microcephaly, and hominin brain evolution.

Dean Falk1, Charles Hildebolt, Kirk Smith, M J Morwood, Thomas Sutikna, E Wayhu Saptomo, Fred Prior.   

Abstract

Earlier observations of the virtual endocast of LB1, the type specimen for Homo floresiensis, are reviewed, extended, and interpreted. Seven derived features of LB1's cerebral cortex are detailed: a caudally-positioned occipital lobe, lack of a rostrally-located lunate sulcus, a caudally-expanded temporal lobe, advanced morphology of the lateral prefrontal cortex, shape of the rostral prefrontal cortex, enlarged gyri in the frontopolar region, and an expanded orbitofrontal cortex. These features indicate that LB1's brain was globally reorganized despite its ape-sized cranial capacity (417cm(3)). Neurological reorganization may thus form the basis for the cognitive abilities attributed to H. floresiensis. Because of its tiny cranial capacity, some workers think that LB1 represents a Homo sapiens individual that was afflicted with microcephaly, or some other pathology, rather than a new species of hominin. We respond to concerns about our earlier study of microcephalics compared with normal individuals, and reaffirm that LB1 did not suffer from this pathology. The intense controversy about LB1 reflects an older continuing dispute about the relative evolutionary importance of brain size versus neurological reorganization. LB1 may help resolve this debate and illuminate constraints that governed hominin brain evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254807     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  15 in total

1.  Primary visual cortex in neandertals as revealed from the occipital remains from the El Sidrón site, with emphasis on the new SD-2300 specimen.

Authors:  Antonio García-Tabernero; Angel Peña-Melián; Antonio Rosas
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Human evolution: Small remains still pose big problems.

Authors:  Chris Stringer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Island Rule, quantitative genetics and brain-body size evolution in Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; Pasquale Raia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  If the skull fits: magnetic resonance imaging and microcomputed tomography for combined analysis of brain and skull phenotypes in the mouse.

Authors:  Brian J Nieman; Marissa C Blank; Brian B Roman; R Mark Henkelman; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Automated measurement of skull circumference, cranial index, and braincase volume from pediatric computed tomography.

Authors:  Kirk Smith; David Politte; Gregory Reiker; Tracy S Nolan; Charles Hildebolt; Chelsea Mattson; Don Tucker; Fred Prior; Sergei Turovets; Linda J Larson-Prior
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

6.  Craniometric ratios of microcephaly and LB1, Homo floresiensis, using MRI and endocasts.

Authors:  Robert C Vannucci; Todd F Barron; Ralph L Holloway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Metopic suture of Taung (Australopithecus africanus) and its implications for hominin brain evolution.

Authors:  Dean Falk; Christoph P E Zollikofer; Naoki Morimoto; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reconstructing the ups and downs of primate brain evolution: implications for adaptive hypotheses and Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Stephen H Montgomery; Isabella Capellini; Robert A Barton; Nicholas I Mundy
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples.

Authors:  Karen L Baab; Kieran P McNulty; Katerina Harvati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.