Literature DB >> 19254597

Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?

Sean C Blackwell1, Jerrie Refuerzo, Rati Chadha, Carlos A Carreno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the overestimation of ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight (EFW) is associated with increased diagnosis of labor arrest. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a historical cohort study of nulliparous women with term pregnancies who underwent bedside ultrasound examination for EFW before labor induction. Labor outcomes of women with EFW overestimation > 15% the actual birthweight were compared with those with EFW not overestimated.
RESULTS: Overestimation of EFW occurred in 9.5% of cases (23/241). The rate of cesarean delivery (CD) for labor arrest was higher for those with EFW overestimation (34.8% vs 13.3%; P = .01) even though there were no differences in length of the induction duration. After adjusting for confounding factors, EFW overestimation remained associated with CD for labor arrest (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-15.2).
CONCLUSION: Our finding suggests that an overestimation of EFW may be associated with a lower threshold for CD for labor arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254597     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

1.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Identifying Fetal Growth Disorders Using Ultrasonography in Women With Diabetes.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Association between Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery among Nulliparous Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; William A Grobman; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Association of Recorded Estimated Fetal Weight and Cesarean Delivery in Attempted Vaginal Delivery at Term.

Authors:  Rosemary J Froehlich; Grecio Sandoval; Jennifer L Bailit; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Labor and Delivery Experiences of Mothers with Suspected Large Babies.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Naomi E Stotland; Ronald E Iverson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

6.  Utilization of antenatal ultrasound scan and implications for caesarean section: a cross-sectional study in rural Eastern China.

Authors:  Kun Huang; Fangbiao Tao; Joanna Raven; Liu Liu; Xiaoyan Wu; Shenglan Tang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Identifying fetal growth disorders using ultrasound in obese nulliparous women.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Berkley Davis; Katie Delaney; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-08-01

8.  Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Olivier Rivière; Brigitte Neveu; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Stubert; Adam Peschel; Michael Bolz; Änne Glass; Bernd Gerber
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Christoph Weiss; Peter Oppelt; Richard Bernhard Mayer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.