Literature DB >> 29086428

Identifying Fetal Growth Disorders Using Ultrasonography in Women With Diabetes.

Annie M Dude1, Lynn M Yee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the ability of third-trimester ultrasonography (US) to diagnose disorders of fetal growth among women with diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: This work was a retrospective cohort study of women with diabetes who delivered term singleton neonates at a single academic medical center and who had a US examination within 5 weeks of delivery. We characterized the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US to detect large-for-gestational age (LGA) and small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants. Large and small for gestational age were defined as a US estimated fetal weight of greater than 90% and less than 10%, respectively, based on the Hadlock formula (Radiology 1991; 181:129-133); US estimates of LGA or SGA were compared with postnatal findings of LGA or SGA based on gestational age-based weight percentiles. Test characteristics were analyzed for the total cohort and by the type of diabetes. We compared the areas under the curve for receiver operating characteristic curves for different types of diabetes.
RESULTS: Of 521 women, 3 (0.6%) screened positive for SGA, and 64 (12.3%) delivered an SGA neonate. In contrast, 129 (24.8%) screened positive for LGA, and 61 (11.7%) delivered an LGA neonate. The receiver operating characteristic curves did not differ significantly for different types of diabetes (P = .68).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography in women with diabetes and term or late preterm pregnancies has high specificity but poor sensitivity for SGA and a low positive predictive value for LGA. The diagnostic capability of US to detect fetal growth abnormalities did not differ significantly by the type of diabetes.
© 2017 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes; fetal growth disorders; obstetrics; ultrasonography; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29086428      PMCID: PMC5906134          DOI: 10.1002/jum.14446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  28 in total

1.  Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?

Authors:  Sean C Blackwell; Jerrie Refuerzo; Rati Chadha; Carlos A Carreno
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks.

Authors:  C Fadigas; Y Saiid; R Gonzalez; L C Poon; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Morbidity and Mortality in Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants: A Secondary Analysis of Nine MFMU Network Studies.

Authors:  Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Van Thi Thanh Truong; Claudia Pedroza; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight Near Delivery in Pregnancies Complicated With Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Amy M Valent; Tondra Newman; Sara Kritzer; Kristin Magner; Carri R Warshak
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal Macrosomia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Vascular complications in the diabetic pregnancy.

Authors:  Gustavo Leguizamón; Denise Trigubo; Juan Ignacio Pereira; María Fernanda Vera; José Alberto Fernández
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Estimate of fetal weight by ultrasound within two weeks of delivery in the detection of fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Amy M Phillips; Amy B Galdamez; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; Everett F Magann
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 8.  Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Avi Ben-Haroush; Yariv Yogev; Moshe Hod
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.901

9.  A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America.

Authors:  W E Brenner; D A Edelman; C H Hendricks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The impact of inadequate gestational weight gain in obese diabetic women.

Authors:  K C Kurnit; R T Overcash; G A Ramos; D Y LaCoursiere
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.